ArticleBMJ open2025
Exploring views and experiences of childbirth-related perineal trauma: a qualitative study protocol for developing a wound management tool and care pathway.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChildbirth-related perineal trauma (CRPT) is the most common complication of childbirth, affecting 80% of women after a vaginal birth. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the care of women following CRPT. Specifically, there is a lack of understanding regarding appropriate postnatal CRPT management, wound assessment and treatment of complications. To improve maternal outcomes, this qualitative study aims to explore women's and healthcare professionals' (HCPs) views and experiences of current CRPT wound management and healing to understand what they would want from an assessment tool and related care pathway being developed by the Chapter programme of research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A qualitative study guided by an interpretive descriptive approach will be undertaken to explore the views and experiences around CRPT. This will be conducted through individual interviews and focus groups with women (n∼40 participants) who have experienced CRPT within the last 12 months and individual interviews with HCPs (n∼25) who care for women who have experienced CRPT. Supported by specialist interpreters where needed, data collection will be audio recorded and transcribed. Data will initially be analysed using codebook thematic analysis for targeted analysis and then using the Framework Method to facilitate a systematic and flexible exploration of themes within and between groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received ethical approval from the University of Birmingham Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematical Ethics Review Committee (ERN_23-0666). Supported by a Patient Advisory Group, this study will contribute to the overall outputs and dissemination of the Chapter programme of research, including a core outcome set for trials investigating the care of women experiencing CRPT, the development of a Wound Assessment Tool, professional resources and guidelines for best practice and patient resources. Findings will be disseminated via conference presentations, peer-reviewed publications, the National Institute for Health and Care Research Journals Library, relevant media platforms and plain language summaries, including infographics. ISRCTN REGISTRATION NUMBER: 45172.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.