ArticleBMJ open2025
Study protocol for a pre-registered randomised open-label trial of ten-session cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT-T) for eating disorders: does stratified augmented treatment lead to better outcomes?
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFurther improvement of cognitive-behavioural therapy for eating disorders (CBT-ED) is required that can provide better outcomes. Recent work showed that the length of therapy is not critical in improving outcomes. Rather, stratifying the treatment to individual needs is required to produce significant improvements. The current study adopts the approach of evaluating augmentations to ten-session CBT (CBT-T) where initial response to therapy is gradual rather than rapid. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Clients aged 15 years and over presenting to the Flinders University Services for Eating Disorders between January 2025 and June 2028 will be randomised to receive either CBT-T as usual or CBT-T augmented with therapy modules (CBT-TA) matched to obstacles to progress for gradual responders. Rapid response, assessed using the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire, is defined as ≥1.13 decrease in global ED psychopathology at session 4. In CBT-TA, the therapist and gradual responder will collaboratively choose at least one of nine augmentations to incorporate into therapy. Rapid responders in this group will be given access to the augmentations for use in their own time. Data for the main intent-to-treat analyses will be collected on five occasions: baseline assessment (T1), immediately preceding session 4 (T2), end of treatment (T3) and 3-month and 6-month follow-up (T4 and T5). The primary outcome is ED psychopathology, and secondary outcomes include behavioural indicators of the ED, impairment caused by the ED, general negative emotion, self-harm and hope. Analyses will be undertaken on an intention-to-treat basis and will include all participants in the group to which they were randomised. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was provided by the Social and Behavioural Research Ethics Committee at Flinders University (7992). This trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12624001495516). The findings arising from the study protocol will be reported to participants and presented at scientific conferences and disseminated by publications submitted to peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12624001495516).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.