Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40280610›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Associations between refraction and ocular biometry in Chinese preschoolers aged 3-6 years: a cross-sectional study in Shunyi, Beijing.

Liting Zhu, Qing Xu, Jing Yuan, Zhanfeng Li, Rui Wang, Aimin Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ocular biometry in isolated versus disease-associated high myopia in children and adolescents: A retrospective observational study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Identifying and Managing Pre-Myopia: A Narrative Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liting ZhuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Shunyi Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1841-4933
Qing XuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Shunyi Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jing YuanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Shunyi Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zhanfeng LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Shunyi Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Rui WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Shunyi Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Aimin JiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Shunyi Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China vision0725@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7587-6156

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the associations between refraction and ocular biometry of preschool children (3-6 years old) in Shunyi District, Beijing.

designCross-sectional study.

settingThis study was conducted in 11 kindergartens in Shunyi District, Beijing.

participantsA total of 1186 Chinese children aged 3-6 years old without any history of Down's syndrome, epilepsy, history of ophthalmologic surgery and other psychiatric disorders were selected. EXCLUSIONS: Children who were unable to cooperate with the examination. 1141 preschoolers completed the examination. 555 subjects (48.6%) were boys and 586 subjects (51.4%) were girls. Cycloplegic refraction, axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD) and corneal radius (CR) were measured for all children. AL-to-CR ratio, lens power (LP) and spherical equivalent (SE) were calculated. Those children were divided according to SE into three groups: hyperopia group, premyopia group and myopia group.

interventionsNone. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Refraction and ocular biometric parameters.

resultsThe prevalence of myopia, premyopia and hyperopia was 2.7% (95% CI 1.8% to 3.7%), 27.3% (95% CI 24.7% to 29.8%) and 70.0% (95% CI 67.4% to 72.7%), respectively. The mean SE was (1.15±0.76) D, and the refraction in the premyopia group was about 1 D lower than in the hyperopic one. The mean AL, ACD, CR, AL/CR and LP were 22.28±0.67 mm, 3.33±0.67 mm, 7.74±0.25 mm, 2.88±0.06 and 25.62±1.46 D, respectively. Differences in AL, ACD, AL/CR and LP among different age groups were statistically significant. Premyopic children had longer eyes, greater ACDs and higher AL/CR ratio than hyperopic children. SE was negatively correlated with AL, ACD, AL/CR and LP.

conclusionsThe most common refractive status of children aged 3-6 years in Shunyi District, Beijing, was hyperopia. The prevalence of premyopia was by no means low. Understanding the refractive status of preschoolers and associations between ocular biometric parameters and refraction might be helpful in providing more effective prevention before the onset of myopia.

Indexed as

BiometryHyperopiaMyopiaRefraction, OcularRefractive ErrorsAnterior ChamberAxial Length, EyeBeijingChildChild, PreschoolChinaCross-Sectional StudiesEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleChildMyopiaPaediatric ophthalmology

Identifiers

PMID40280610
PMCPMC12035447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.