ArticleThe Journal of pediatrics2025
Parental Perspectives on Development in Children Born Extremely Preterm.
Article in The Journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo understand how parents form assessments of their children's development following discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and to explore why these assessments may differ from the physicians' assessments. STUDY
designWe used semi-structured interviews to explore where parents obtained information about development and how they integrated that information to form an overall appraisal of their child's developmental status.
resultsBased on 23 interviews with parents, we learned that discharge from the NICU demarcated 2 separate phases of appraising development. In the NICU, most parents reported simultaneously recognizing that sequelae of prematurity would likely persist beyond discharge and chose to see discharge as an end point. Following discharge, parents often assessed their child's status with an emphasis on progress rather than comparison with age-matched peers. In both phases, parents preferred information that was positive and actionable regarding development. Parents integrated external information with their own observations of their child in forming an overall appraisal of their child's development. Parents' ideas about their child's development were intertwined with their assessments of their own and their family's coping.
conclusionsAn understanding of how families' assessments diverge from medical ones creates opportunity to align better with these measures and support parents. If researchers integrate parents' perspectives on development, that could lead to the development of meaningful metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.