Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40280380›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2025

Unsupervised discovery of clinical disease signatures using probabilistic independence.

Thomas A Lasko, William W Stead, John M Still, Thomas Z Li, Michael Kammer, Marco Barbero-Mota, Eric V Strobl, Bennett A Landman, Fabien Maldonado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thomas A LaskoVanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Dr, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Vanderbilt University, 2301 Vanderbilt Pl, Nashville, TN 37235, USA. Electronic address: tom.lasko@vanderbilt.edu.
William W SteadVanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Dr, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
John M StillVanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Dr, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Thomas Z LiVanderbilt University, 2301 Vanderbilt Pl, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
Michael KammerVanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Dr, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Marco Barbero-MotaVanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Dr, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Eric V StroblVanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Dr, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; University of Pittsburgh, 4200 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Bennett A LandmanVanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Dr, Nashville, TN 37232, USA; Vanderbilt University, 2301 Vanderbilt Pl, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
Fabien MaldonadoVanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Dr, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Novel Integrative Approach for the Early Detection of Lung Cancer using Repeated MeasuresR01CA253923 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LANDMAN, BENNETT A., MALDONADO, FABIEN · 2021 to 2025
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NCI NIH HHS R01 CA253923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study uses probabilistic independence to disentangle patient-specific sources of disease and their signatures in Electronic Health Record (EHR) data. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe model a disease source as an unobserved root node in the causal graph of observed EHR variables (laboratory test results, medication exposures, billing codes, and demographics), and a signature as the set of downstream effects that a given source has on those observed variables. We used probabilistic independence to infer 2000 sources and their signatures from 9195 variables in 630,000 cross-sectional training instances sampled at random times from 269,099 longitudinal patient records. We evaluated the learned sources by using them to infer and explain the causes of benign vs. malignant pulmonary nodules in 13,252 records, comparing the inferred causes to an external reference list and other medical literature. We compared models trained by three different algorithms and used corresponding models trained directly from the observed variables as baselines.

resultsThe model recovered 92% of malignant and 30% of benign causes in the reference standard. Of the top 20 inferred causes of malignancy, 14 were not listed in the reference standard, but had supporting evidence in the literature, as did 11 of the top 20 inferred causes of benign nodules. The model decomposed listed malignant causes by an average factor of 5.5 and benign causes by 4.1, with most stratifying by disease course or treatment regimen. Predictive accuracy of causal predictive models trained on source expressions (Random Forest AUC 0.788) was similar to (p = 0.058) their associational baselines (0.738). DISCUSSION: Most of the unrecovered causes were due to the rarity of the condition or lack of sufficient detail in the input data. Surprisingly, the causal model found many patients with apparently undiagnosed cancer as the source of the malignant nodules. Causal model AUC also suggests that some sources remained undiscovered in this cohort.

conclusionThese promising results demonstrate the potential of using probabilistic independence to disentangle complex clinical signatures from noisy, asynchronous, and incomplete EHR data that represent the confluence of multiple simultaneous conditions, and to identify patient-specific causes that support precise treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsUnsupervised Machine LearningAlgorithmsHumansLung NeoplasmsModels, StatisticalProbabilityCausal inferenceElectronic health recordsIndeterminate pulmonary noduleLung cancerMachine learningPhenotype discovery

Identifiers

PMID40280380
PMCPMC12767692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.