ReviewNeurotoxicology2025
Developmental neurotoxicity of bisphenol F and bisphenol S in animal model systems: A literature review.
Review in Neurotoxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vascular Endocrine-Disrupting Effects of Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S on Human Umbilical Artery.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Article
- Bisphenol A and its analogues in thyroid diseases: Evidence from dysfunction, autoimmunity, and cancer.iScience · 2026Review
- Exposome influences: a multi-omics perspective on the combined toxic effects of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
- Serotonergic and Cholinergic Imbalance in the Offspring of Rats Exposed to Bisphenol A and Bisphenol S During Pregnancy and Lactation: Short- and Long-Term Effects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Bisphenol S impairs courtship, grooming, and locomotor behaviors inmicroPublication biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurodevelopmental disorders have complex etiologies, stemming both from genetic and environmental risk factors, including gestational exposure to bisphenol A (BPA). BPA is an endocrine-disrupting chemical widely used in the synthesis of plastics and epoxy-resins. In 2012, the Food and Drug Administration issued a ban on the use of BPA in certain baby and childhood products, which contributed to the proliferation of BPA-free products. To make products without BPA, plastic and epoxy manufacturers often use chemical analogs, including bisphenol F (BPF) and bisphenol S (BPS). However, the structural and biochemical similarities BPF and BPS share with BPA suggest they may have similar molecular and cellular impacts on the developing nervous system, despite consumers generally regarding BPA-free products as safer alternatives. In this review, we synthesized all available peer-reviewed primary literature to date reporting on the neurodevelopmental impacts of BPF and/or BPS in animal models. In total, 61 papers were identified as relevant to the topic, including evaluation of BPF- and BPS-associated neurodevelopmental phenotypes such as changes in neurodevelopmental gene expression, the proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells, synaptogenesis, central nervous system morphology, neuronal cell death, and behavior. Though less extensively studied than BPA, the collective works described here indicate that BPF and BPS can act as developmental neurotoxicants in animal models, urging further mechanistic and epidemiological analyses of these bisphenol analogs, as well as a reconsideration by regulatory agencies of policies surrounding their usage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.