ArticleArthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association2025
Conversion to Arthroscopic Surgery for Anterior Shoulder Instability Does Not Significantly Increase Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs, But Both Conversion and Initial Arthroscopic Management Are Twice as Costly as Isolated Nonoperative Management.
Article in Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- No Significant Difference in Cost or Outcomes at 1-Year Minimum Follow-Up After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy Comparing 1.9 mm Distal Chip-on-Tip Needlescope Versus 4 mm Glass Rod Lens Arthroscope: Both Treatments Are Highly Cost-Effective.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- 3D ZTE MRI Versus 3D CT for Measurement of Glenoid Bone Loss: An Analysis of Agreement, Accuracy, and Cost Comparison.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo elucidate patient out-of-pocket costs associated with arthroscopic and nonoperative treatment of anterior shoulder instability, with a secondary aim to examine the costs of conversion from nonoperative to arthroscopic treatment within 12 months after initial shoulder instability diagnosis.
methodsThe MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database was used to identify patients aged 18 to 40 years with anterior shoulder instability via diagnosis codes from 2014 to 2017. Three cohorts were created: an operative cohort, a nonoperative cohort, and an operative conversion cohort. The operative cohort was initially treated with primary arthroscopic shoulder surgery. The nonoperative cohort was treated with physical therapy. The conversion cohort was initially treated nonoperatively and then converted to operative management. Eighty-one patients with failed arthroscopic treatment were excluded. Open stabilization procedures were excluded as well. Patient out-of-pocket costs were calculated for each cohort and compared.
resultsIn total, 713 operative, 1,144 nonoperative, and 79 conversion cohort patients were identified. Initial nonoperative treatment failed in approximately 6% of patients (79 of 1,223). Patients in the operative cohort were more likely to be men (percentage of male patients, 78% vs 69%; P < .001) and to be younger (median age, 21 years vs 26 years; P < .001) than those in the nonoperative cohort. Nonoperative treatment had the lowest patient out-of-pocket cost ($998 for nonoperative vs $1,961 for operative, P < .001), and conversion to operative treatment had the highest patient cost ($2,230). The additional cost of physical therapy, when nonoperative treatment fails, played a significant role in this difference.
conclusionsAmong patients presenting for evaluation of anterior shoulder instability, converting from nonoperative to arthroscopic treatment does not significantly increase patient costs compared with initial arthroscopic intervention. However, both treatment pathways are roughly 2 times more costly to the patient than isolated nonoperative management. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study shows that nonoperative management of anterior shoulder instability is associated with the lowest patient out-of-pocket costs whereas conversion from nonoperative to arthroscopic treatment results in the highest costs. These findings highlight the financial implications of treatment selection and the potential cost burden for patients in whom initial conservative management fails.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.