ArticleMolecular medicine reports2025
CDK5 targets p21
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cyclins and Cyclin-Dependent Kinases: Structure, Biological Functions, and Innovative Targeting Strategies in Cancer.MedComm · 2026Review
- Anticancer Potential of Atractylenolides I-III: Efficacy, Mechanisms, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Duality of Cdk5: A Master Regulator in Neurodevelopment and a Hijacked Oncogene in Cancer.Cells · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cyclin‑dependent kinase 5 (CDK5), known for its role in neuronal function, has emerged as a key player in cancer biology, particularly in thyroid cancer. The present study explored the interaction between CDK5 and the cyclin‑dependent kinase inhibitor p21
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.