ArticleEBioMedicine2025
Artificial intelligence-driven genotype-epigenotype-phenotype approaches to resolve challenges in syndrome diagnostics.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biallelic inactivating variants in the chromatin remodeler DMAP1 cause a syndromic neurodevelopmental disorder.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- Leveraging Next-Generation Phenotyping in Dysmorphology to Support Variant Interpretation in Mowat-Wilson Syndrome.Neurology. Genetics · 2026Article
- Molecular genotype-phenotype correlation in ACTB- and ACTG1-related non-muscle actinopathies.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence with Global Genomic Resources: A Narrative Review of Implications for Precision Medicine.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- AI-based methods for the assessment of DNA damage and repair mechanisms.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Review
- Characterization of CTNND2-related neurodevelopmental disease, phenotype-genotype spectrum and WNT dynamics in early neurogenesis.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
41 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDecisions to split two or more phenotypic manifestations related to genetic variations within the same gene can be challenging, especially during the early stages of syndrome discovery. Genotype-based diagnostics with artificial intelligence (AI)-driven approaches using next-generation phenotyping (NGP) and DNA methylation (DNAm) can be utilized to expedite syndrome delineation within a single gene.
methodsWe utilized an expanded cohort of 56 patients (22 previously unpublished individuals) with truncating variants in the MN1 gene and attempted different methods to assess plausible strategies to objectively delineate phenotypic differences between the C-Terminal Truncation (CTT) and N-Terminal Truncation (NTT) groups. This involved transcriptomics analysis on available patient fibroblast samples and AI-assisted approaches, including a new statistical method of GestaltMatcher on facial photos and blood DNAm analysis using a support vector machine (SVM) model.
findingsRNA-seq analysis was unable to show a significant difference in transcript expression despite our previous hypothesis that NTT variants would induce nonsense mediated decay. DNAm analysis on nine blood DNA samples revealed an episignature for the CTT group. In parallel, the new statistical method of GestaltMatcher objectively distinguished the CTT and NTT groups with a low requirement for cohort number. Validation of this approach was performed on syndromes with known DNAm signatures of SRCAP, SMARCA2 and ADNP to demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach.
interpretationWe demonstrate the potential of using AI-based technologies to leverage genotype, phenotype and epigenetics data in facilitating splitting decisions in diagnosis of syndromes with minimal sample requirement.
fundingThe specific funding of this article is provided in the acknowledgements section.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.