ArticlePoultry science2025
Genome-wide comparative analysis of variability and population structure between autochthonous Turkish chicken breeds and commercial hybrid lines.
Article in Poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Selection Signatures and Genetic Divergence in Hotan Black and F2 Yeonsan Ogye Chickens.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide Analysis of Copy Number Variation in Vietnamese Local Chickens.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Candidate genes related to growth and milk production in three Anatolian goats revealed by GWAS.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026Article
- Genomic scans for diversity and selection signatures in Indian Red Sindhi cattle.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have revolutionized livestock genomics by enabling rapid, high-resolution genotyping of local populations with thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), offering unprecedented accuracy and cost efficiency. This study presents the first comprehensive genomic assessment of the Denizli (DNZ) and Gerze (GRZ) chicken breeds, comparing them to commercial broiler and layer hybrid lines using the double digest restriction-site associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq) technique. A total of 94,208 bi-allelic SNPs were common between DNZ and GRZ, while 33,284 SNPs were retained among all populations after the quality filtering process. Genetic diversity parameters were higher in native Turkish chicken breeds compared to hybrid lines in which minor allele frequency (MAF) was higher than 0.3 in DNZ and GRZ while it was lower than this value in commercial hybrid lines. Notably, DNZ displayed the highest observed (0.386) and expected (0.375) heterozygosity, whereas the broiler hybrid line showed the lowest heterozygosity (0.254), suggesting inbreeding depression (FIS = 0.241). The negative inbreeding coefficient values occurring due to random mating were observed in DNZ and GRZ chicken breeds, while this value was estimated at 0.118 in the layer hybrid line. Population structure analyses such as principal component analyses (PCA), genetic distance-based neighbor-joining (NJ) tree, ADMIXTURE, and TreeMix algorithm revealed that DNZ and GRZ were genetically distinct from both each other and commercial hybrid lines. The results of this study confirm that comprehensive conservation strategies are efficient approaches to keeping genetic variability at an optimal level without inbreeding. Moreover, this study demonstrates the efficacy of ddRADseq in generating high-throughput genotypic data, providing a cost-effective framework for genomic diversity and population structure studies in indigenous chicken breeds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.