Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40279691›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2025

Effectiveness of sanitizers on different biofilm-forming microorganisms associated with the poultry drinking water system.

Tolulope T Ogundipe, Tomi Obe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tolulope T OgundipeDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Tomi ObeDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA; Department of Food Science, Center for Food Safety, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA. Electronic address: toobe@uark.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sanitation of the poultry drinking water system (DWS) is essential to controlling pathogens and biofilms in the DWS. Intervention approaches including several sanitizers have been developed, but there is limited information on the efficacy of some of these sanitizers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of peracid-based (PAB), peroxide-based (PB), and hypochlorite-based (HB) sanitizers against field-isolated Salmonella (10), E. coli (2) and Bacillus (2), along with their antibiofilm effects on six of these bacterial strains on polyvinylchloride (PVC), a common DWS pipe material. The minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations (MIC and MBC) were determined using the microdilution broth method. For biofilm production, PVC rings were inoculated (5-6 Log

Indexed as

BacillusBiofilmsDisinfectantsDrinking WaterEscherichia coliSalmonellaAnimalsHypochlorous AcidMicrobial Sensitivity TestsDisinfectantsDrinking WaterHypochlorous AcidBiofilmPoultry drinking water systemPVC pipeSanitizersWater quality

Identifiers

PMID40279691
PMCPMC12434250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.