Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40279645›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Enhancing Bidirectional Encoder Representations From Transformers (BERT) With Frame Semantics to Extract Clinically Relevant Information From German Mammography Reports: Algorithm Development and Validation.

Daniel Reichenpfader, Jonas Knupp, Sandro Urs von Däniken, Roberto Gaio, Fabio Dennstädt, Grazia Maria Cereghetti, André Sander, Hans Hiltbrunner, Knud Nairz, Kerstin Denecke

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniel ReichenpfaderInstitute for Patient-Centered Digital Health, School of Engineering and Computer Science, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Biel/Bienne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8052-3359
Jonas KnuppID SUISSE AG, St. Gallen, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7483-7719
Sandro Urs von DänikenDepartment of Diagnostic, Interventional, and Pediatric Radiology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2169-9438
Roberto GaioDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9840-1366
Fabio DennstädtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5374-8720
Grazia Maria CereghettiDepartment of Diagnostic, Interventional, and Pediatric Radiology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2228-8169
André SanderID BERLIN, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1843-3125
Hans HiltbrunnerDepartment of Diagnostic, Interventional, and Pediatric Radiology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0336-0331
Knud NairzDepartment of Diagnostic, Interventional, and Pediatric Radiology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3337-110X
Kerstin DeneckeInstitute for Patient-Centered Digital Health, School of Engineering and Computer Science, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Biel/Bienne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6691-396X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStructured reporting is essential for improving the clarity and accuracy of radiological information. Despite its benefits, the European Society of Radiology notes that it is not widely adopted. For example, while structured reporting frameworks such as the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System provide standardized terminology and classification for mammography findings, radiology reports still mostly comprise free-text sections. This variability complicates the systematic extraction of key clinical data. Moreover, manual structuring of reports is time-consuming and prone to inconsistencies. Recent advancements in large language models have shown promise for clinical information extraction by enabling models to understand contextual nuances in medical text. However, challenges such as domain adaptation, privacy concerns, and generalizability remain. To address these limitations, frame semantics offers an approach to information extraction grounded in computational linguistics, allowing a structured representation of clinically relevant concepts.

objectiveThis study explores the combination of Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) architecture with the linguistic concept of frame semantics to extract and normalize information from free-text mammography reports.

methodsAfter creating an annotated corpus of 210 German reports for fine-tuning, we generate several BERT model variants by applying 3 pretraining strategies to hospital data. Afterward, a fact extraction pipeline is built, comprising an extractive question-answering model and a sequence labeling model. We quantitatively evaluate all model variants using common evaluation metrics (model perplexity, Stanford Question Answering Dataset 2.0 [SQuAD_v2], seqeval) and perform a qualitative clinician evaluation of the entire pipeline on a manually generated synthetic dataset of 21 reports, as well as a comparison with a generative approach following best practice prompting techniques using the open-source Llama 3.3 model (Meta).

resultsOur system is capable of extracting 14 fact types and 40 entities from the clinical findings section of mammography reports. Further pretraining on hospital data reduced model perplexity, although it did not significantly impact the 2 downstream tasks. We achieved average F

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that frame semantics provides a robust and interpretable framework for automating structured reporting. By leveraging frame semantics, the approach enables customizable information extraction and supports generalization to diverse radiological domains and clinical contexts with additional annotation efforts. Furthermore, the BERT-based model architecture allows for efficient, on-premise deployment, ensuring data privacy. Future research should focus on validating the model's generalizability across external datasets and different report types to ensure its broader applicability in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMammographySemanticsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGermanyHumansannotationinformation extractionlarge language modelsmammographynatural language processingquality controlradiologystructured reportingtemplate filling

Identifiers

PMID40279645
PMCPMC12064967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.