Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40279640›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2025

Enhancing Interoperability for a Sustainable, Patient-Centric Health Care Value Chain: Systematic Review for Taxonomy Development.

Carlos Antonio Marino, Claudia Diaz Paz

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carlos Antonio Marino *CENTRUM Católica Graduate Business School, Lima, Peru, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6393-6346
Claudia Diaz PazCENTRUM Católica Graduate Business School, Lima, Peru, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3334-0015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCreating a sustainable, patient-centered health care system necessitates integrated supply chains supported by information technologies. However, achieving interoperability among various devices and systems remains a significant hurdle. Our research highlights the need for systematic reviews that address health care interoperability as a holistic knowledge domain. Notably, we observed a lack of studies that outline its structure or develop a comprehensive, high-order facet-based taxonomy from the perspective of supply or value chains. This study aims to address that gap.

objectiveThe primary aim of this study is to elucidate the knowledge structure within the extensive domain of health care interoperability, with an emphasis on trending topics, critical hot spots, and the categorization of significant issues. Furthermore, we aim to model the higher-order elements of a taxonomy for health care interoperability within the context of the health care value chain framework.

methodsWe used both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework guided our selection process. We examined 6 databases-Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed-focusing on journal articles and gray literature published from 2011 onward. Articles were screened using predefined eligibility criteria. Quantitative bibliometric techniques-including cluster, factor, and network analyses-were applied to explore the structure of the knowledge. A subset of articles was selected for qualitative synthesis using an iterative coding process to develop a higher-order facet-based taxonomy.

resultsWe identified 370 articles for quantitative analysis. The bibliometric analysis revealed 2 major clusters. Key terms in the first cluster included interoperability, electronic health record, and eHealth-with betweenness centralities of 70.971, 59.460, and 12.000, respectively, and closeness centralities of 0.047, 0.043, and 0.034, respectively. In the second cluster, the most relevant terms were IoT, blockchain, and health care-with betweenness centralities of 6.765, 2.581, and 1.283, respectively, and closeness centralities of 0.034, 0.030, and 0.030, respectively. Factor analysis explained 59.46% of the variance in a 2-factor model, with the first dimension accounting for 36.78% and the second dimension for 22.68%. The qualitative review of 79 articles yielded a taxonomy with 4 higher-order facets: object (what is shared), source (what mechanism is used), ambit (space covered), and content (technology primarily involved). Each facet extended to a third level of classification.

conclusionsThe comprehensive domain of health care interoperability, viewed through the lens of a sustainable value chain, encompasses studies that highlight various facets or attributes. These studies underscore the relevance of eHealth within this knowledge domain and reflect a strong focus on 2 key health information technologies: electronic health records and the Internet of Things.

Indexed as

Patient-Centered CareHumanselectronic health record (EHR)Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR)health careinteroperabilityvalue chain

Identifiers

PMID40279640
PMCPMC12064981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.