ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2025
Behavioural evidence of a humidistat: a temperature-compensating mechanism of hydroregulation in spotted salamanders.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to control hydration state is essential for terrestrial species, especially amphibians, which are highly susceptible to dehydration. Here, we examined how temperature (17°C versus 22°C) influenced behavioural hydroregulation in spotted salamanders (Ambystoma maculatum) using a laboratory humidity gradient. Salamanders defended a constant vapour pressure deficit (VPD) between temperatures by targeting higher relative humidity at 22°C than at 17°C, possibly to compensate for increased evaporative demand at warmer temperatures. Individuals selecting higher VPDs experienced greater evaporative water loss (EWL), with larger salamanders losing more water than smaller ones after accounting for temperature. Together, these results highlight a trade-off among body size, humidity preference and desiccation tolerance. Salamanders also rehydrated faster at 22°C than 17°C, highlighting temperature-dependent water uptake rates. Our finding that salamanders regulated a constant driving force of evaporation between temperatures suggests they are able to detect rates of EWL. Local evaporative cooling of the skin is a plausible mechanism: if moist-skinned ectotherms show local evaporative cooling on exposed surfaces but not on those in contact with the substrate, then the temperature gradient between dorsal and ventral skin could act as an effective cue to detect the drive for EWL. Ultimately, our study underscores the complexity of amphibian hydroregulation and emphasises the role of behaviour in maintaining hydration state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.