Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40279393›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Comparative analysis of STP6 and STP10 unravels molecular selectivity in sugar transport proteins.

Camilla Gottlieb Andersen, Laust Bavnhøj, Søren Brag, Anastasiia Bohush, Adriana Chrenková, Jan Heiner Driller, Bjørn Panyella Pedersen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A two-step mechanism for sugar translocation.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Camilla Gottlieb AndersenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus C DK-8000, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7645-3060
Laust BavnhøjDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus C DK-8000, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5711-6619
Søren BragDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus C DK-8000, Denmark.
Anastasiia BohushDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus C DK-8000, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7519-3463
Adriana ChrenkováDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus C DK-8000, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3833-9336
Jan Heiner DrillerDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus C DK-8000, Denmark.
Bjørn Panyella PedersenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus C DK-8000, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7860-7230

Funding

EC | European Research Council (ERC) 101000936Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF) NNF24OC0088380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The distribution of sugars is crucial for plant energy, signaling, and defense mechanisms. Sugar Transport Proteins (STPs) are Sugar Porters (SPs) that mediate proton-driven cellular uptake of glucose. Some STPs also transport fructose, while others remain highly selective for only glucose. What determines this selectivity, allowing STPs to distinguish between compounds with highly similar chemical composition, remains unknown. Here, we present the structure of

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsGlucoseMonosaccharide Transport ProteinsBinding SitesBiological TransportFructoseSubstrate SpecificitySugarsArabidopsis ProteinsFructoseGlucoseMonosaccharide Transport ProteinsSugarsplant sugar uptakeSTP10STP6sugar porter familysugar transport

Identifiers

PMID40279393
PMCPMC12054785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.