ArticlePloS one2025
Examining trip-level errors in passively collected mobile device data for data quality assurance.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Location-based service (LBS) data passively collected by mobile devices has been widely adopted in multiple fields for its advantages in revealing travel behaviors. Data quality assessments have always been important steps for analyses using the data, but the impact of trip-level errors has not been a focus of these assessments. We examine a newly emerged type of error present at trip-level in LBS datasets that violates the spatio-temporal consistency of such data by including trips on road segments where and when there should be no trips. We designed a distributed-computing workflow to quantify the errors by comparing the number of trips on closed road segments during road closures with time periods before and after. Using two real-world cases from 2023, we examined multiple datasets acquired from major vendors in the US, and several of the datasets contained a significant number of trip-level errors. These findings point to the errors being present in recent datasets that have not otherwise been processed for data quality and can significantly impact analyses by data users. Data users should consider conducting trip-level error data quality checks as part of their preprocessing steps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.