SynthesisPloS one2025
Prognostic significance of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations in stage II/III colorectal cancer: A retrospective study and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Analysis of PIK3CA mutation prevalence variation among colorectal cancer populations: a comprehensive review.Molecular biology reports · 2025Pooled it
- GenoGlyph: Pan-cancer genomic mutation inference and risk stratification from diagnostic histopathology slides.Research square · 2026Article
- The Heterogeneity of Mucinous Colorectal Adenocarcinoma-Histologic and Molecular Phenotypes Drive Prognostic Outcomes.Cancers · 2026Article
- Article
- Trends and Outcomes of the Liver-First Surgical Approach for Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Isolated Liver Metastases.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Increased Risk of Central Mesocolic Lymph Node Metastases in BRAF-Mutated Stage I-III Colon Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- RAS mutation status and immune microenvironment define distinct prognostic landscapes and predict chemotherapy benefit in pMMR colorectal cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Prognostic and Predictive Value of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Colon Cancer in the Era of Molecular Biomarkers.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2026Article
- Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Molecular Pathogenesis, Metabolic Vulnerabilities, and Therapeutic Potential of Sorghum Polyphenols.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2026Review
- The Prognostic Significance of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF Mutations in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2026Article
- Emerging KRAS G12D inhibitor in the treatment of digestive system tumors: opportunities and challenges.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Clinical utility of comprehensive genomic profiling test for colorectal cancer: a single institution prospective observational study.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Observational
- Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Colorectal Cancer: Evidence and Outcomes-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognostic significance of KRAS and BRAF mutations is well-established in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) but remains uncertain in early-stage tumors. This study retrospectively analyzed 47 stage II/III CRC patients undergoing curative surgery to assess the association of mutations in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Additionally, a meta-analysis was conducted to validate the prognostic relevance of these gene mutations. We included post hoc analyses of phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in stage II/III patients receiving adjuvant therapy after curative resection in the meta-analysis. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using a random-effect model in the overall population, stratified subgroups adjusted for microsatellite instability (MSI) status, and within MSI-high (MSI-H) and microsatellite-stable (MSS) populations. In the retrospective cohort, mutations in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA were identified in 29.8%, 4.3%, 8.5%, and 14.9% of patients, respectively. No significant association between individual genes and survival was observed. However, in MSS patients, concurrent mutations were significantly associated with shorter OS and DFS (log-rank test, P < 0.05). The meta-analysis incorporated 13 eligible studies, including 15,034 patients. Pooled analyses revealed that KRAS and BRAF mutations were significantly linked to poor OS (KRAS: HR = 1.25, 95%CI: 1.06-1.47, P = 0.008; BRAF: HR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.26-1.63, P < 0.001) and DFS (KRAS: HR = 1.36, 95%CI: 1.21-1.53, P < 0.001; BRAF: HR = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.02-1.44, P = 0.032). The prognostic impact of BRAF mutation increased with MSI adjustment compared those without MSI adjustment. In MSS tumors, KRAS-mutant patients demonstrated significantly shorter DFS (HR = 1.63, 95%CI: 1.25-2.13, P < 0.001), while BRAF-mutant patients exhibited reduced OS (HR = 1.53, 95%CI: 1.24-1.89, P < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 1.72, 95%CI: 1.20-2.46, P = 0.003) compared to wildtype patients. Conversely, no significant survival differences were found between mutant and wildtype patients in the MSI-H population. Although PIK3CA mutation was nominally associated with OS (HR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.75-1.00, P = 0.046), the pooled result lacked robustness. In conclusion, KRAS and BRAF mutations had a negative prognostic impact on MSS stage II/III CRC patients receiving adjuvant therapy following curative resection. These patients may benefit from more effective adjuvant treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.