Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40279317›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2025

Prognostic significance of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations in stage II/III colorectal cancer: A retrospective study and meta-analysis.

Di Kang, Jing Li, Yangyang Li, Jingquan Xu, Jianlei Yang, Zili Zhang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Di KangDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, The Third Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin, China.
Jing LiDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, The Third Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin, China.
Yangyang LiDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, The Third Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin, China.
Jingquan XuDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, The Third Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin, China.
Jianlei YangDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, The Third Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin, China.
Zili ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, The Third Central Clinical College of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0009-0006-3189-5160

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognostic significance of KRAS and BRAF mutations is well-established in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) but remains uncertain in early-stage tumors. This study retrospectively analyzed 47 stage II/III CRC patients undergoing curative surgery to assess the association of mutations in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Additionally, a meta-analysis was conducted to validate the prognostic relevance of these gene mutations. We included post hoc analyses of phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in stage II/III patients receiving adjuvant therapy after curative resection in the meta-analysis. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using a random-effect model in the overall population, stratified subgroups adjusted for microsatellite instability (MSI) status, and within MSI-high (MSI-H) and microsatellite-stable (MSS) populations. In the retrospective cohort, mutations in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA were identified in 29.8%, 4.3%, 8.5%, and 14.9% of patients, respectively. No significant association between individual genes and survival was observed. However, in MSS patients, concurrent mutations were significantly associated with shorter OS and DFS (log-rank test, P < 0.05). The meta-analysis incorporated 13 eligible studies, including 15,034 patients. Pooled analyses revealed that KRAS and BRAF mutations were significantly linked to poor OS (KRAS: HR = 1.25, 95%CI: 1.06-1.47, P = 0.008; BRAF: HR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.26-1.63, P < 0.001) and DFS (KRAS: HR = 1.36, 95%CI: 1.21-1.53, P < 0.001; BRAF: HR = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.02-1.44, P = 0.032). The prognostic impact of BRAF mutation increased with MSI adjustment compared those without MSI adjustment. In MSS tumors, KRAS-mutant patients demonstrated significantly shorter DFS (HR = 1.63, 95%CI: 1.25-2.13, P < 0.001), while BRAF-mutant patients exhibited reduced OS (HR = 1.53, 95%CI: 1.24-1.89, P < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 1.72, 95%CI: 1.20-2.46, P = 0.003) compared to wildtype patients. Conversely, no significant survival differences were found between mutant and wildtype patients in the MSI-H population. Although PIK3CA mutation was nominally associated with OS (HR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.75-1.00, P = 0.046), the pooled result lacked robustness. In conclusion, KRAS and BRAF mutations had a negative prognostic impact on MSS stage II/III CRC patients receiving adjuvant therapy following curative resection. These patients may benefit from more effective adjuvant treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsGTP PhosphohydrolasesMembrane ProteinsMutationPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)AdultAgedClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMiddle AgedBRAF protein, humanClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesGTP PhosphohydrolasesKRAS protein, humanMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID40279317
PMCPMC12027030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.