Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40279271›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Popcorn: prediction of short coding and noncoding genomic sequences in prokaryotes.

Alison Kyrouz, Lian Liu, Lixin Qin, Brian Tjaden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alison KyrouzDepartment of Computer Science, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481, United States.
Lian LiuDepartment of Computer Science, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481, United States.
Lixin QinDepartment of Computer Science, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481, United States.
Brian TjadenDepartment of Computer Science, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA 02481, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-8664-7296

Funding

System and Methods for Analysis of Bacterial TranscriptomesR15GM102755 · NIGMS · WELLESLEY COLLEGE · PI TJADEN, BRIAN · 2013 to 2024
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM102755NIH HHS GM102755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryThe most challenging prokaryotic genes to identify often correspond to short ORFs (sORFs) encoding small proteins or to noncoding RNAs. RNA-seq experiments commonly evince small transcripts that do not correspond to annotated genes and are candidates for novel coding sORFs or small regulatory RNAs, but it can be difficult to accurately assess whether the numerous small transcripts are coding or not. We present Popcorn (PrOkaryotic Prediction of Coding OR Noncoding), a novel machine learning method for determining whether prokaryotic sequences are coding or noncoding. We find that Popcorn is effective in distinguishing coding from noncoding sequences, including coding sORFs and noncoding RNAs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Freely available for use on the web at https://cs.wellesley.edu/∼btjaden/Popcorn. Source code available at https://github.com/btjaden/Popcorn and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15120075.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialGenomicsOpen Reading FramesRNA, UntranslatedSoftwareMachine LearningRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID40279271
PMCPMC12054974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.