Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40279264›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Gencube: centralized retrieval and integration of multi-omics resources from leading databases.

Keun Hong Son, Je-Yoel Cho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Keun Hong SonDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2583-6272
Je-Yoel ChoDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1030-3577

Funding

Science Research Center NRF-2021R1A5A1033157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe volume of multi-omics data for diverse species is growing at an unprecedented rate, with new genome assemblies, related annotations, and high-throughput sequencing resources being submitted daily to various genomic data repositories. In response to this data influx, both existing and new databases are establishing optimized hierarchical structures to manage the vast amount of information. However, the lack of accessible command-line tools, combined with the functional limitations and unintuitive design of existing options, presents significant challenges for researchers. This gap underscores a critical need for a tool that enables streamlined retrieval and integration of omics data across these diverse repositories.

resultsWe have developed Gencube, a command-line tool that enables centralized retrieval and integration of a comprehensive set of six different data types-genome assemblies, gene sets, annotations, sequences, comparative genomic data, and NGS-based omics resources-from various leading databases. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Gencube is a free and open-source tool, with its code available on GitHub: https://github.com/snu-cdrc/gencube and also archived on Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14607649.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGenomicsInformation Storage and RetrievalSoftwareHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMolecular Sequence AnnotationMultiomics

Identifiers

PMID40279264
PMCPMC12041413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.