ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2025
Migration of Deep Learning Models Across Ultrasound Scanners.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A transfer function approach has recently proven effective for calibrating deep learning (DL) algorithms in quantitative ultrasound (QUS), addressing data shifts at both the acquisition and machine levels. Expanding on this approach, we develop a strategy to acquire the functionality of a DL model from one ultrasound machine and implement it on another in a black-box setting, in the context of QUS. This demonstrates the ease with which the functionality of a DL model can be transferred between machines. While the proposed approach can also assist regulatory bodies in comparing and approving DL models, it also highlights the security risks associated with deploying such models in a commercial scanner for clinical use. The method is a black-box unsupervised domain adaptation technique that integrates the transfer function approach with an iterative schema. It does not utilize any information related to model internals but it solely relies on the availability of an input-output interface. Additionally, we assume the availability of unlabeled data from a testing machine. This scenario could become relevant as companies begin deploying their DL functionalities for clinical use. In the experiments, we used a SonixOne and a Verasonics machine. The model was trained on SonixOne data, and its functionality was then transferred to the Verasonics machine. The proposed method successfully transferred the functionality to the Verasonics machine, achieving a remarkable 98 percent classification accuracy in a binary decision task. This study underscores the need to establish security measures prior to deploying DL models in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.