ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2025
Highly Elevated Metal Ion Levels After Tumor Resections and Reconstruction With Megaprostheses Around the Knee.
Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metal ion exposure after oncologic megaprosthesis salvage surgery: a systematic review.Journal of bone oncology · 2026Article
- Knee arthroplasty failure is associated with significant systemic multimetal exposure.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Editorial Comment: The Combined Selected Proceedings From the 2024 International Society of Limb Salvage Meeting and the 2024 Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Meeting.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- CORR Insights®: Highly Elevated Metal Ion Levels After Tumor Resections and Reconstruction With Megaprostheses Around the Knee.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTumor resections around the knee leave defects that are often reconstructed with megaprostheses. Because megaprostheses have a large surface area, modular design, and constrained coupling mechanism, they are prone to metal wear, which can result in elevated levels of metal ions, particularly cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr). Currently, there are limited published data on elevated ion levels in megaprostheses but not in a homogeneous, well-defined patient population with respect to location and type of prosthesis. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: What metal ion levels were observed in patients who underwent distal femoral or proximal tibial megaprostheses at a minimum follow-up time of 1 year?
methodsBetween May 1992 and November 2023, we performed 81 total knee megaprostheses as part of tumor reconstructions. Of those, we considered 65 surviving patients as potentially eligible. Based on that, 34% (22) were excluded because they did not respond and were lost to follow-up or refused to participate, leaving 66% (43) for analysis in this study at a median (range) follow-up time of 88 months (13 to 379). Whole blood samples were obtained and analyzed for Co and Cr. Medical records were reviewed, and signs of metallosis were assessed.
resultsElevated levels of Co and Cr were found in 95% (41 of 43) of patients. The levels of both ions were found to correlate with each other. For distal femoral and proximal tibial replacement, the median (range) Co levels were 13.7 µg/L (1.0 to 91.5) and 7.3 µg/L (0.8 to 19.9), respectively. For Cr, the values were 9.6 µg/L (0.5 to 22.3) and 7.2 µg/L (0.5 to 7.2), respectively (p = 0.07). The length of resection was not associated with ion concentrations. Metallosis was observed in 26% (11 of 43) of patients either visible through the skin at presentation or noted at the time of a revision procedure. Mechanical failure (such as breakage of the joint mechanism and loosening of the stems), increased BMI, and adjuvant therapies were not associated with elevated blood ions. Both Co and Cr levels were lower in patients measured at longer follow-up compared with those measured earlier after arthroplasty.
conclusionBased on our results, elevated ion levels are common in patients with megaprostheses. In addition, we note that 21% (9 of 43) of patients had Co levels above 20 µg/L, which is worrisome. Considering that the patients in this and other studies showed no clinical symptoms even with elevated ion levels, care must be taken not to alarm patients. We were not able to identify any factors associated with having higher ion level concentrations that could be used to define groups that could benefit from ion measurements. Currently, as we do not have good thresholds for when apparently high ion levels are worrisome, in patients with megaprostheses who develop unexplained cardiac or neurologic abnormalities, one might consider testing metal ion levels as part of the diagnostic process. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.