ArticleClinical and translational science2025
Development of an Ancestrally Inclusive Preemptive Pharmacogenetic Testing Panel.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial of Preemptive Pharmacogenetic Testing in Underserved Patients (TOPP UP): Study Framework and Baseline Characteristics of Randomized Controlled Trial Participants.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Pharmacogenetics and Molecular Ancestry ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing can individualize pharmacotherapy, but many current panels lack inclusivity for diverse populations and are often cost-prohibitive for medically underserved communities. This study aimed to develop and validate GatorPGx Plus, a low-cost, preemptive PGx panel tailored for diverse patient populations. Pharmacogenes were selected based on the drug/drug classes potentially influenced by their variants, the clinical severity of drug-gene interactions, or the strength of guideline recommendations or emerging evidence. Variants within the pharmacogenes were included if their allele frequencies were approximately 1% or greater in any major ancestral population. The panel was validated for accuracy, precision, and analytical sensitivity and applied to 124 participants from an ongoing pharmacogenetic clinical implementation trial. To reduce costs, a high-throughput platform was chosen, laboratory technician hands-on time was minimized, and result translation and reporting were automated. The panel comprised tests for 62 variants in 14 genes/gene regions, including a CYP2D6 copy number assay. It demonstrated 100% concordance with reference methods. The average turnaround time between test order and results was 14.3 (±6.4) days. Among the 124 genotyped trial participants (mean age 60 years, 57.3% female), 99% had at least one non-normal function (less common or higher-risk) phenotype. The most frequently identified non-normal function phenotypes were in CYP2C19 (69.4%). CYP2D6 *17, *29, and CYP2C19 *9 were captured at higher frequencies than reported in European populations. GatorPGx Plus is a low per-test cost, clinically validated, preemptive PGx panel that effectively captures key variants in a mixed-ancestry population, underscoring its potential clinical utility in diverse, medically underserved populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.