ReviewJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025
A scoping review exploring cancer survivorship in Africa: 2011 to 2024.
Review in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of decentralized cervical cancer survivorship care at district hospitals in Rwanda: a multi-site pilot implementation study.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Adherence to Survivorship Care Visits in Patients With Cervical Cancer in Botswana.JCO global oncology · 2026Observational
- Childhood Cancer Survivorship in Cameroon: A Pilot Study at Mbingo Baptist Hospital Demonstrates the Need for Structured Survivorship Follow-Up and Support Services.Sage open pediatricsArticle
- Mapping the Cancer Survivorship Landscape in West Africa: A Narrative Review of Challenges, Care Models and Policy Implications.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe scope of cancer survivorship in Africa remains largely unexplored. This scoping review aims to describe current survivorship-related factors and care delivery characteristics in Africa, and to provide insights that can inform a more systematic integration of survivorship care into the broader cancer care continuum.
methodsFour databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science: Core, CINAHL Plus) were searched for journal articles and grey literature published from 2011 to August 2024 in English. Articles were included if they focused on post-treatment care for African cancer survivors. Covidence® was utilised for screening and data collection. Microsoft Excel was used for data cleaning and analysis.
resultsA total of 9417 articles were screened and 181 included. The number of studies per year grew from 6 (2011) to 32 (2023). These comprised 71 conference abstracts and 110 journal articles conducted in 19 African countries. The study methodologies utilised include 97 quantitative, 42 qualitative, 25 programme descriptions, and 18 mixed methods. Childhood survivorship was the focus for 40 studies. Psychosocial effects of cancer and its treatment were discussed in 104 studies.
conclusionsInterest in post-treatment cancer survivorship and related care is increasing across Africa. While significant research has explored the physical and psychosocial effects of cancer, there remains a critical need for studies focused on care coordination, targeted interventions, and strategies to improve quality-of-life outcomes for survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The overall scope of post-treatment cancer survivorship care in Africa primarily centres on psychosocial outcomes, with limited emphasis on care coordination. This underscores the need for further research and the development of context-relevant, feasible, and integrated care models within African health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40279092What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.