Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40279072›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2025

COVID-19 isolation and recovery sites evaluation: Lessons learned for systems innovation.

Michelle Firestone, Kimia Khoee, Gillian Kolla, Patricia O'Campo, Rosane Nisenbaum, D Linn Holness, Lisa Schlosser, Michaela Beder, Lorie Steer, Terry Pariseau and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michelle FirestoneMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kimia KhoeeMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gillian KollaMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Patricia O'CampoMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Rosane NisenbaumMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
D Linn HolnessMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lisa SchlosserSt. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Michaela BederDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lorie SteerThe Neighbourhood Group, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Terry PariseauToronto Alliance to End Homelessness, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ahmed M BayoumiMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. ahmed.bayoumi@utoronto.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe City of Toronto opened COVID-19 Isolation and Recovery Sites (CIRS) in 2020 in response to the need for supported isolation spaces for people experiencing homelessness. As a team of academic researchers and community partners, we assessed how lessons from the CIRS can inform post-pandemic policies for people experiencing homelessness. We focused on identifying models and systems of care for understanding existing services and integration, identifying innovations, and imagining how care can be transformed to be more caring and just.

methodsWe conducted 43 key informant interviews with clinicians, peer and harm reduction workers, executive leaders, operational leaders, and people who worked for funding or decision-making organizations. Data were coded and analyzed using deductive content analysis.

resultsThe CIRS presented a new service model that moved away from being overly medicalized towards having a community orientation, which involved greater integration of services for people experiencing homelessness, transparent decision-making, and open communication. Key to this approach were clinical case management, harm reduction services, strong support of peer workers, and adequate and consistent funding. Future models will need to address power imbalances and hierarchies through formal agreements and processes as well as establishing collaborative cultures.

conclusionThe CIRS offer an important opportunity to rethink services offered within shelter settings. Such change will require a strong vision, sufficient funding, political will, and accountability among all stakeholders. The COVID-19 pandemic offers decision makers an opportunity to consider system-level transformation by looking at largely successful elements of the crisis responses.

Indexed as

COVID-19Ill-Housed PersonsHumansOntarioOrganizational InnovationCase managementCommunity-based participatory researchCOVID-19Harm reductionIll-housed personsPovertyProgram evaluationSocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID40279072
PMCPMC12755136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.