ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2025
COVID-19 isolation and recovery sites evaluation: Lessons learned for systems innovation.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe City of Toronto opened COVID-19 Isolation and Recovery Sites (CIRS) in 2020 in response to the need for supported isolation spaces for people experiencing homelessness. As a team of academic researchers and community partners, we assessed how lessons from the CIRS can inform post-pandemic policies for people experiencing homelessness. We focused on identifying models and systems of care for understanding existing services and integration, identifying innovations, and imagining how care can be transformed to be more caring and just.
methodsWe conducted 43 key informant interviews with clinicians, peer and harm reduction workers, executive leaders, operational leaders, and people who worked for funding or decision-making organizations. Data were coded and analyzed using deductive content analysis.
resultsThe CIRS presented a new service model that moved away from being overly medicalized towards having a community orientation, which involved greater integration of services for people experiencing homelessness, transparent decision-making, and open communication. Key to this approach were clinical case management, harm reduction services, strong support of peer workers, and adequate and consistent funding. Future models will need to address power imbalances and hierarchies through formal agreements and processes as well as establishing collaborative cultures.
conclusionThe CIRS offer an important opportunity to rethink services offered within shelter settings. Such change will require a strong vision, sufficient funding, political will, and accountability among all stakeholders. The COVID-19 pandemic offers decision makers an opportunity to consider system-level transformation by looking at largely successful elements of the crisis responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.