Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40279071›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026

Advocating for cash incentives instead of gift cards in public health research: Dollars over donuts.

Alexandra Kubica, Ben Evans-Durán, Daniel Z Buchman, Aaron M Orkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexandra KubicaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-4555-6087
Ben Evans-DuránDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3085-7764
Daniel Z BuchmanDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8944-6647
Aaron M OrkinDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. aaron.orkin@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1111-8720

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incentives for participation can help enable more equitable public health research practices, particularly when working with people from structurally disadvantaged populations, such as people who use drugs or people experiencing homelessness. Administrative and perceived ethical advantages have solidified gift card incentives in research, even though participants tend to prefer cash incentives for their time, knowledge, and contribution of lived experiences. The use of cash instead of gift cards may merit fresh attention. Drawing from research with marginalized groups, we summarize concerns with gift cards and argue that cash incentives align better with public health ethical principles. Gift cards, while convenient for researchers, can constrain participants' economic autonomy, foster mistrust, and magnify inequities and power imbalances between researchers and participants. Cash can help to affirm participants' autonomy, reduce stigma, demonstrate solidarity and trustworthiness, and directly benefit health. Public health researchers and ethics boards can enable cash incentive practices that centre participant welfare over researcher and institutional convenience. In so doing, they uphold more equitable and respectful relationships with study participants, advancing both public health research and ethical standards.

Indexed as

Gift GivingMotivationPublic HealthCanadaHumansEquityParticipant autonomyParticipant compensationParticipant incentivesResearch ethicsSolidarityTrust

Identifiers

PMID40279071
PMCPMC13001148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.