Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40278962›Full record

ArticleClinical child and family psychology review2026

Scientific Progress in Mapping the Relational Ecology of Early Child Development: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Siobhan O'Dean, Elizabeth Spry, Tracy Evans-Whipp, Kayla Mansour, Rebecca Glauert, Craig A Olsson, Tim Slade, Australian Early Relational Health Network

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical child and family psychology review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Siobhan O'DeanThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5898-2065
Elizabeth SpryFaculty of Health, SEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2837-3514
Tracy Evans-WhippFaculty of Health, SEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1993-6023
Kayla MansourFaculty of Health, SEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4165-3943
Rebecca GlauertUniversity of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6272-8932
Craig A OlssonFaculty of Health, SEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5927-2014
Tim SladeThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. tim.slade@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-1725-9188
Australian Early Relational Health Network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of secure relationships between children and their adult carers, across the earliest years of life, emerges within a multifaceted and complex relational ecology. Here we present findings from a systematic scoping review designed to map the extent to which the relational ecology of child-caregiver relationships across early life (from conception to age 3 years) has been studied. A first phase of the review searched for studies that used applied social network analysis (SNA) to measure the relational ecology. A second phase extended the scope to studies of associations between individual elements of the relational ecology and the early child-caregiver relationship. Searches were conducted between February and September, 2023, rerun in March 2025and in total, yielded 11,226 articles for screening. We found no studies using SNA to investigate the relational ecology of early child-caregiver relationship development. We did, however, find 122 studies that examined individual predictors across the relational ecosystem of the early child-caregiver relationship. Most studies focused on the family microsystem and in particular the mother-child relationship. Few studies examined other aspects of the microsystem, or higher levels of the relational ecosystem (meso-, exo- or macrosystems). Our findings highlight that much of the broader relational ecology of early child relational health development continues to be neglected in observational research. Future research should consider using novel methods like SNA to capture and explain interconnections between relationships at all levels of the relational ecology of early child-caregiver relationship development.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentParent-Child RelationsChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornBioecological model of human developmentEarly child developmentRelational ecologyScoping reviewSocial network analysis

Identifiers

PMID40278962
PMCPMC13282221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.