Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40278940›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2025

Occlusal changes during orthognathic therapy using a completely customised lingual appliance - initial retrospective observations.

Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich, Jannik Steur, Sachin Chhatwani, Frauke Beyling, Gholamreza Danesh, Dirk Wiechmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephan Christian MöhlhenrichDepartment of Orthodontics, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 45, 58455, Witten, Germany. stephan.moehlhenrich@uni-wh.de.
Jannik SteurDepartment of Orthodontics, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 45, 58455, Witten, Germany.
Sachin ChhatwaniDepartment of Orthodontics, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 45, 58455, Witten, Germany.
Frauke BeylingPrivate Practice, Lindenstraße 44, 49152, Bad Essen, Germany.
Gholamreza DaneshDepartment of Orthodontics, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 45, 58455, Witten, Germany.
Dirk WiechmannPrivate Practice, Lindenstraße 44, 49152, Bad Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to examine the treatment outcomes, particularly the orthodontic decompensation before surgery, in patients who underwent orthognathic treatment and were treated with completely customised lingual appliances (CCLAs).

methods25 patients who received combined orthognathic treatment for skeletal Class II (N = 10) or Class III (N = 15) malocclusion were retrospectively investigated. Study models from before treatment (T0), immediately before surgery (T1) and after treatment (T2), as well as digitised setup and operation models, were analysed using PAR Index and by measuring tooth pairs in contact.

resultsThe initial PAR scores were comparable (T0: Class II: 33.30 ± 7.85; Class III: 35.90 ± 1.20; p = 0.539), and significant improvements were observed following treatment (T0 vs. T2: Class II: p = 0.002; Class III: p = 0.002). Excellent final PAR scores were recorded, with no statistical differences between the groups (T2: Class II: 1.60 ± 2.80; Class III: 0.80 ± 2.08; p = 0.246). The PAR scores for setup and operation models were 0.00 ± 0.00 and 4.20 ± 3.29 for Class II and 0.07 ± 0.26 and 2.47 ± 1.92 for Class III, respectively. No significant differences were found between setup and final model (Class II: p = 0.063; Class III: p = 0.125), but between OP and final model (Class II: p = 0.002; Class III: p = 0.001). Tooth pairs in contact demonstrated similar results. DISCUSSION: Using CCLAs in combined orthognathic treatment is efficient and leads to high-quality outcomes in Class II and III patients. Moreover, it enables excellent dental arch alignment before surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Optimal pre-surgical dental arch alignment, both before orthognathic surgery and after the completed therapy, can be achieved using CCLAs.

Indexed as

Malocclusion, Angle Class IIMalocclusion, Angle Class IIIOrthodontic Appliance DesignOrthognathic Surgical ProceduresAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCCLACompletely customised lingual appliancesLingual orthodonticsOrthognathic surgeryPAR indexPAR scoreTooth contactTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID40278940
PMCPMC12031849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.