ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Characterization of hypomineralization second primary molar and molar incisor hypomineralization in patients with orofacial clefts.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cleft lip and palate are associated with a higher prevalence of molar-incisor hypomineralisation: a cross-sectional study with a comparison group.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo identify and characterize hypomineralization in the second primary molar (HSPM) and molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH), as well as other developmental defects of enamel (DDE) in patients with clefts considering dentition type, tooth type, phenotype and cleft laterality. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this cross-sectional retrospective study, 6432 deciduous and permanent teeth of 290 patients with clefts aged between 3 and 14 years in a referral hospital were assessed using intraoral photographs. The classification of demarcated hypomineralization was carried out by a calibrated examiner using the MIH index. Statistical analyses were performed using a binomial generalized linear model.
resultsDeciduous and permanent molars were the most affected by HSPM and MIH, whereas incisors and canines were most affected by hypoplasia, with the upper arch being most affected by DDE. Cleft phenotypes involving the palate were associated with HSPM (OR = 31; 95% CI: 1.0-59.3) and MIH (OR = 31.6; 95% CI: 0.6-53.2).
conclusionPatients with clefts had a high prevalence of HSPM and MIH in the upper arch and were associated with more severe cleft phenotypes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Pediatric dentists who are members of the multidisciplinary teams responsible for caring for patients with clefts need to have a more discerning clinical eye when diagnosing DDE in patients with clefts. Posterior teeth are more susceptible to demarcated hypomineralizations in patients with clefts, while anterior teeth are more susceptible to hypoplasias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40278923What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.