SynthesisRheumatology international2025
Clinical features and diagnostic challenges in crowned dens syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Rheumatology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Resection of the Posterior Arch of the Atlas for Crowned Dens Syndrome.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- Crowned Dens Syndrome: A Case Report Describing Refractory Symptoms.Case reports in rheumatology · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Underreporting of Crowned Dens Syndrome-Associated Calcifications on Cervical Spine CT in Patients with Neck Pain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crowned Dens Syndrome (CDS) is an acute inflammatory neck pain linked to Calcium Pyrophosphate crystal deposition surrounding the odontoid process. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to illuminate the Features and Diagnostic Challenges of CDS. PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Scopus databases were searched in July 2024 to include all studies on CDS without publication year or language restrictions. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiological data, in addition to treatment regimens and outcomes, were extracted and analyzed. PROSPERO registration number is CRD42024575491. We analyzed 153 reports, including 196 CDS patients, with a mean age of 73.13 ± 12.95 years and an almost equal female-to-male ratio. Neck pain was the most common symptom (96.8%). CRP and ESR were elevated in 91.4% and 80.7% of cases, respectively. CT scans had the highest detection rate for abnormalities (97.3%), compared to MRI (68.4%) and plain radiographs (79.4%). NSAIDs were the most frequently used treatment (62.5%), with improvement observed in 96.6% of cases. Meningitis was the most common misdiagnosis (21.4%), leading to a higher likelihood of plain radiographs and lumbar punctures. In contrast, patients with neck tenderness and restricted range of motion had a lower risk of misdiagnosis. Patients who were initially misdiagnosed were more likely to undergo LP (13.1% Vs. 34.8%; P-value < 0.001). CDS is an elderly disease that usually presents as acute neck pain with elevated inflammatory markers and is frequently misdiagnosed as meningitis. Recognizing key clinical features may improve diagnosis and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40278908What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.