Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40278884›Full record

SynthesisRheumatology international2025

Barriers and facilitators associated with diagnostic and treatment delays in lupus in the Global South and North: a systematic review of qualitative and mixed methods studies.

Amaranta Manrique de Lara, Tirsa Colmenares-Roa, Laura Athié, Yurilis Fuentes-Silva, Cinthya Cadena-Trejo, María Fernanda Ramírez-Flores, Alfonso Gastelum-Strozzi, Rosana Quintana, Bernardo A Pons-Estel, Ingris Peláez-Ballestas

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Rheumatology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amaranta Manrique de Lara *Research Unit, Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1531-8770
Tirsa Colmenares-Roa *Research Unit, Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3899-4787
Laura AthiéInstituto de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Cetlu A.C, Puebla, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4194-3665
Yurilis Fuentes-SilvaDepartment of Medicine, Universidad de Oriente, Bolivar, Venezuela.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5915-769X
Cinthya Cadena-TrejoEpidemiology Doctoral Student, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4954-2639
María Fernanda Ramírez-FloresPrograma de Estudios Combinados en Medicina (PECEM), Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7843-4816
Alfonso Gastelum-StrozziInstituto de Ciencias Aplicadas y Tecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9668-5822
Rosana QuintanaGrupo Oroño, Centro Regional de Enfermedades Autoinmunes y Reumáticas (GO-CREAR), Rosario, CP S2000, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0643-2755
Bernardo A Pons-EstelGrupo Oroño, Centro Regional de Enfermedades Autoinmunes y Reumáticas (GO-CREAR), Rosario, CP S2000, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2518-0266
Ingris Peláez-BallestasRheumatology Unit, Hospital General de México "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", Mexico City, Mexico. pelaezin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5188-7375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, there is no specific definition of delay in the diagnosis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. This study aimed to describe the experiences of diagnostic and treatment delays in lupus, along with their associated barriers and facilitators, and to contrast this phenomenon in the Global South and North. A qualitative systematic review of the literature was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA guidelines. A targeted electronic search strategy was performed in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. This protocol was registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO CRD42023456508). From 1,135 identified registries, 12 (ten qualitative and two mixed methods) articles were included in the analysis, most from the Global North. None of the publications clearly define diagnostic delay in lupus. Patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals identified a range of barriers and facilitators. Misdiagnosis, miscommunication, the lack of rheumatology knowledge and education, and the diagnostic pilgrimage were barriers reported in both regions. In the Global South, barriers were related to a fragmented and complex healthcare system, stigma, and economic and geographic difficulties. In the Global North, physician-patient interactions and reliance on antinuclear antibody testing were significant barriers. The reported facilitators mostly comprised individual-level factors like self-care and resilience. This review highlights the lack of a clear definition of diagnostic and treatment delays in lupus, integrating the perspectives of patients, family and caregivers, and healthcare providers. The contrasting emphasis on external context factors in the Global South may reflect underlying health inequalities.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisHealth Services AccessibilityLupus Erythematosus, SystemicTime-to-TreatmentHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchTreatment DelayBarriers to access health servicesDiagnosis delayFacilitatorsQualitative researchSystematic reviewSystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.