SynthesisRheumatology international2025
Barriers and facilitators associated with diagnostic and treatment delays in lupus in the Global South and North: a systematic review of qualitative and mixed methods studies.
Synthesis in Rheumatology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Harnessing AI and social media to understand real-world patient experiences in SLE.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, there is no specific definition of delay in the diagnosis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. This study aimed to describe the experiences of diagnostic and treatment delays in lupus, along with their associated barriers and facilitators, and to contrast this phenomenon in the Global South and North. A qualitative systematic review of the literature was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA guidelines. A targeted electronic search strategy was performed in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. This protocol was registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO CRD42023456508). From 1,135 identified registries, 12 (ten qualitative and two mixed methods) articles were included in the analysis, most from the Global North. None of the publications clearly define diagnostic delay in lupus. Patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals identified a range of barriers and facilitators. Misdiagnosis, miscommunication, the lack of rheumatology knowledge and education, and the diagnostic pilgrimage were barriers reported in both regions. In the Global South, barriers were related to a fragmented and complex healthcare system, stigma, and economic and geographic difficulties. In the Global North, physician-patient interactions and reliance on antinuclear antibody testing were significant barriers. The reported facilitators mostly comprised individual-level factors like self-care and resilience. This review highlights the lack of a clear definition of diagnostic and treatment delays in lupus, integrating the perspectives of patients, family and caregivers, and healthcare providers. The contrasting emphasis on external context factors in the Global South may reflect underlying health inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40278884What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.