Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40278776›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and infectious disease2025

Using a Machine Learning Approach to Predict Snakebite Envenoming Outcomes Among Patients Attending the Snakebite Treatment and Research Hospital in Kaltungo, Northeastern Nigeria.

Nicholas Amani Hamman, Aashna Uppal, Nuhu Mohammed, Abubakar Saidu Ballah, Danimoh Mustapha Abdulsalam, Frank Mela Dangabar, Nuhu Barde, Bello Abdulkadir, Suraj Abdullahi Abdulkarim, Habu Dahiru and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and infectious disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nicholas Amani HammanSnakebite Treatment and Research Hospital, Kaltungo 770110, Gombe State, Nigeria.ORCID 0009-0000-2105-3062
Aashna UppalThe Global Health Network, Centre for Global Health and Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 7SG, UK.
Nuhu MohammedSnakebite Treatment and Research Hospital, Kaltungo 770110, Gombe State, Nigeria.
Abubakar Saidu BallahSnakebite Treatment and Research Hospital, Kaltungo 770110, Gombe State, Nigeria.
Danimoh Mustapha AbdulsalamDepartment of Community Medicine and Public Health, Gombe State University, Gombe 760214, Gombe State, Nigeria.
Frank Mela DangabarSnakebite Treatment and Research Hospital, Kaltungo 770110, Gombe State, Nigeria.
Nuhu BardeSnakebite Treatment and Research Hospital, Kaltungo 770110, Gombe State, Nigeria.
Bello AbdulkadirGombe State Hospital Services Management Board, Gombe 760253, Gombe State, Nigeria.
Suraj Abdullahi AbdulkarimState Ministry of Health, Gombe 760253, Gombe State, Nigeria.
Habu DahiruState Ministry of Health, Gombe 760253, Gombe State, Nigeria.
Idris MohammedImmunology and Infectious Disease Unit, Federal Teaching Hospital Gombe, Gombe 620261, Gombe State, Nigeria.
Trudie LangThe Global Health Network, Centre for Global Health and Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 7SG, UK.
Joshua Abubakar DifaDepartment of Community Medicine and Public Health, Gombe State University, Gombe 760214, Gombe State, Nigeria.

Funding

Health Data Research UK-The Alan Turing Institute Wellcome PhD Programme in Health Data Science 218529/Z/19/ZWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Snakebite Treatment and Research Hospital (SBTRH) is a leading centre for snakebite envenoming care and research in sub-Saharan Africa, treating over 2500 snakebite patients annually. Despite routine data collection, routine analyses are seldom conducted to identify trends or guide clinical practices. This study retrospectively analyzes 1022 snakebite cases at SBTRH from January to June 2024. Most patients were adults (62%) and were predominantly male (72%). Key factors such as age, sex, and time between bite and hospital presentation were associated with outcomes, including recovery, amputation, debridement, and death. Adult males who took more than four hours to arrive to hospital were identified as a high-risk group for poor outcomes. Using patient characteristics, an XGBoost model was developed and was compared to Random Forest and logistic regression models. In general, all models had high positive predictive value and low sensitivity, meaning that if they predicted a patient to experience amputation, debridement, or death, that patient almost always actually experienced amputation, debridement, or death; however, most models rarely made this prediction. The XGBoost model with all features was optimal, given that it had both a high positive predictive value and relatively high sensitivity. This may be of significance to resource-limited settings like SBTRH, where antivenoms can be scarce; however, more research is needed to build better predictive models. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions for high-risk groups, and further research and integration of machine-learning-driven decision support tools in low-resource-limited clinical settings.

Indexed as

antivenomepidemiologylow-resource settingmachine learningNigeriapatient outcomessnakebite

Identifiers

PMID40278776
PMCPMC12031592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.