ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2025
Use of Open-Source Large Language Models for Automatic Synthesis of the Entire Imaging Medical Records of Patients: A Feasibility Study.
Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesReviewing the entire history of imaging exams of a single patient's records is an essential step in clinical practice, but it is time and resource consuming, with potential negative effects on workflow and on the quality of medical decisions. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of three open-source large language models (LLMs) for the automatic generation of concise summaries of patient's imaging records. Secondary objectives were to assess correlations among the LLMs and to evaluate the length reduction provided by each model.
methodsThree state-of-the-art open-source large language models were selected: Llama 3.2 11B, Mistral 7B, and Falcon 7B. Each model was given a set of radiology reports. The summaries produced by the models were evaluated by two experienced radiologists and one experienced clinical physician using standardized metrics.
resultsA variable number of radiological reports (n = 12-56) from four patients were selected and evaluated. The summaries generated by the three LLM showed a good level of accuracy compared with the information contained in the original reports, with positive ratings on both clinical relevance and ease of reference. According to the experts' evaluations, the use of the summaries generated by LLMs could help to reduce the time spent on reviewing the previous imaging examinations performed, preserving the quality of clinical data.
conclusionsOur results suggest that LLMs are able to generate summaries of the imaging history of patients, and these summaries could improve radiology workflow making it easier to manage large volumes of reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.