ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2025
Radiomic Features of Mesorectal Fat as Indicators of Response in Rectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Therapy.
Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRectal cancer represents a major cause of mortality in the United States. Management strategies are highly individualized, depending on patient-specific factors and tumor characteristics. The therapeutic landscape is rapidly evolving, with notable advancements in response rates to both radiotherapy and chemotherapy. For locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC, defined as up to T3-4 N+), the standard of care involves total mesorectal excision (TME) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as the gold standard for local tumor staging and is increasingly pivotal in post-treatment restaging.
aimIn our study, we proposed an MRI-based radiomic model to identify characteristic features of peritumoral mesorectal fat in two patient groups: good responders and poor responders to neoadjuvant therapy. The aim was to assess the potential presence of predictive factors for favorable or unfavorable responses to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, thereby optimizing treatment management and improving personalized clinical decision-making.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients with LARC who underwent pre- and post-nCRT MRI scans. Patients were classified as good responders (Group 0) or poor responders (Group 1) based on MRI findings, including tumor volume reduction, signal intensity changes on T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and alterations in the circumferential resection margin (CRM) and extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) status. Classification criteria were based on the established literature to ensure consistency. Key clinical and imaging parameters, such as age, TNM stage, CRM involvement, and EMVI presence, were recorded. A radiomic model was developed using the LASSO algorithm for feature selection and regularization from 107 extracted radiomic features.
resultsWe included 44 patients (26 males and 18 females) who, following nCRT, were categorized into Group 0 (28 patients) and Group 1 (16 patients). The pre-treatment MRI analysis identified significant features (out of 107) for each sequence based on the Mann-Whitney test and
conclusionsWe developed an MRI-based radiomic model capable of differentiating and predicting between two groups of rectal cancer patients: responders and non-responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This model has the potential to identify, at an early stage, lesions with a high likelihood of requiring surgery and those that could potentially be managed with medical treatment alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.