Observational studyToxins2025
Real-World Insights into the Effectiveness and Tolerability of OnabotulinumtoxinA in Chronic Migraine: A Long-Term Evaluation of up to 11 Years.
Observational study in Toxins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Botulinum Toxin for Chronic Migraine: Beyond Headache Reduction and Toward Possible Cognitive Benefits.Toxins · 2026Review
- Re-assessing the clinical significance of long-term neuromuscular alterations following Onabotulinumtoxin-A (BoNTA) in chronic migraine: Letter to the editor on behalf of the GRASP study group.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Article
- Response to: 'Re-assessing the clinical significance of long-term neuromuscular alterations following onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine'.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Article
- Updates on the Proposed Botulinum Toxin A Mechanisms of Action in Orofacial Pain: A Review of Animal Studies.Toxins · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic migraine (CM) is a debilitating neurological disorder that imposes substantial burdens on individuals and society, including diminished quality of life and increased healthcare utilization. While the efficacy of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) has been demonstrated in controlled trials, this longitudinal, real-world study offers unprecedented evidence of its long-term benefits, with patients followed for a median of 15 months (interquartile range: 6-36 months) and up to 11 years.
methodsThis retrospective analysis included 579 patients diagnosed with CM who were newly treated with BoNT-A, according to the PREEMPT protocol, receiving injections every 12 weeks at doses of 155-195 units across 31-39 sites. Outcomes were assessed through changes in monthly headache days, frequency, symptomatic medication use, and migraine-related disability using Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores up to 60 months from recruitment. Safety was evaluated by recording treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with a focus on long-term tolerability and subgroup variability.
resultsPatients showed sustained improvements, with the mean number of monthly headache days decreasing from 22.7 to 5.5, and symptomatic medication use dropping from 33.4 to 3.7 mean doses at 60 months. Additionally, over 60% of patients improved from severe (MIDAS Grade IV) to minimal disability (MIDAS Grade I). Subgroup analysis revealed variability in response rates, emphasizing the need for personalized approaches. TEAEs were predominantly mild, with no new adverse events reported after 36 months, supporting the long-term safety of BoNT-A in real-world settings.
conclusionsThis real-world study provides significant evidence for the long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of BoNT-A in the preventive treatment of CM. The findings highlight the importance of real-world data to account for patient variability and tailoring treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.