ArticleToxins2025
Computational Immunogenetic Analysis of Botulinum Toxin A Immunogenicity and HLA Gene Haplotypes: New Insights.
Article in Toxins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Trial of Prophylactic Biostimulator Interventions to Mitigate Facial Sagging Associated With GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Induced Weight Loss.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- A 15-Year Computational Twin Modeling Study of Botulinum Toxin A Frequency and Age-Related Facial Aging.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Filler-Induced Lymphatic Compromise: In Silico Modelling of Facial Safety Thresholds and Injection Techniques.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) is widely used in both therapeutic and aesthetic settings; however, the formation of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) remains a critical concern, leading to treatment failure. Immunogenic responses are known to vary between individuals due to HLA polymorphisms. Although some claim that neurotoxin-associated proteins (NAPs) shield BoNT-A from immune detection or are themselves immunogenic, there is limited molecular evidence supporting either view. This study applies computational immunogenetics to explore BoNT-A immunogenicity, focusing on HLA binding and the influence of accessory proteins. Epitope mapping, molecular docking, and HLA binding predictions were used to evaluate interactions between BoNT-A epitopes and selected class II HLA alleles (HLA-DQA1*01:02, HLA-DQA1*03:03, HLA-DQB1*06:04, HLA-DQB1*03:01, and HLA-DRB1*15:01). To assess the potential immunomodulatory role of NAPs, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) analysis, and electrostatic potential mapping were also conducted. Key epitopes-L11, N25, and C10-showed strong binding affinities to HLA-DQA1*01:02, HLA-DQB1*06:04, and HLA-DQA1*03:03, indicating a potential immunodominant role. NAPs did not obstruct these epitopes but slightly increased their exposure and appeared to stabilize the toxin structure. Electrostatic mapping and binding free energy calculations suggested no significant immunogenic shift in the presence of NAPs. BoNT-A immunogenicity appears to be influenced by HLA allele variability, reinforcing the value of patient-specific genetic profiling. The presumed immunogenic role of NAPs remains unsubstantiated at the molecular level, underscoring the need for evidence-based evaluation over commercial rhetoric. While these findings provide valuable molecular insight, it is important to acknowledge that they are derived entirely from in silico analyses. As such, experimental validation remains essential to confirm the immunological relevance of these predicted interactions. Nonetheless, this computational framework offers a rational basis for guiding future clinical research and the development of HLA-informed BoNT-A therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.