ReviewToxins2025
Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Hair and Scalp Disorders: Current Evidence and Clinical Applications.
Review in Toxins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Trichodynia Associated with Hair Loss Disorders: A Retrospective Study.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Botulinum Toxin Vascular Effectiveness: Low or High Doses?Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Review
- Advances in Medicalized Hair Loss Solutions: A Review of Current Clinical Practices and Regenerative Medicine-Based Protocols with Focus on Off-Label Injectable Treatments.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The Genetic Landscape of Androgenetic Alopecia: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives.Biology · 2026Review
- Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Combined with Platelet-Rich Plasma Promotes Hair Follicle Growth and Regeneration via STMN1 Modulation and Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway Activation.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Introduction toToxins · 2025Article
- Androgenetic Alopecia: An Update on Pathogenesis and Pharmacological Treatment.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is well-recognized throughout dermatology for its cosmetic indications and growing therapeutic value. Recent studies have trialed BoNT in the treatment of hair and scalp disorders, many of which lack long-term effective treatments and significantly impact quality of life. In this review, we summarize the current clinical literature on this topic to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy, safety, and clinical value of BoNT in treating hair and scalp conditions. A literature search on PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus identified 40 articles reporting the use of 25-200 units of BoNT-A or B in 689 patients with hair loss (79.5%), scalp seborrheic dermatitis/hyperseborrhea (10%), craniofacial hyperhidrosis (9%), folliculitis decalvans/dissecting folliculitis (0.86%), scalp pain (0.43%), or linear scleroderma (0.29%). Most studies on BoNT therapy for androgenetic alopecia (AGA) reported mild or non-significant hair growth; however, considerable variability in outcome measures complicates the ability to draw definitive conclusions or justify the use of BoNT over established AGA therapies. BoNT-A and B showed consistent efficacy in treating craniofacial hyperhidrosis with minimal side effects. Additional scalp conditions may benefit from BoNT therapy, but the evidence is limited, and larger, controlled studies are needed to better understand BoNT's clinical value in these conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.