Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40278594›Full record

ArticleToxics2025

Prediction of Soil Pollution Risk Based on Machine Learning and SHAP Interpretable Models in the Nansi Lake, China.

Min Wang, Ruilin Zhang, Beibei Yan, Chengyuan Song, Yang Lv, Hengyi Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Min WangCollege of Earth Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.
Ruilin ZhangCollege of Earth Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.
Beibei YanGeophysical Prospecting and Surveying Team of Shandong Bureau of Coal Geological, Jinan 250014, China.
Chengyuan SongCollege of Earth Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.
Yang LvCollege of Earth Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.
Hengyi ZhaoCollege of Earth Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.

Funding

2023 special scientific research project of Shandong Coalfield Geology Bureau China LMDK[2023]10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess and predict the Nansi Lake soil pollution risk, we evaluate the soil environmental quality in the Nansi Lake region using machine learning techniques, combined with the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) model for interpretability. The primary objective was to predict the level of soil pollution caused by heavy metals, incorporating the traditional Pollution Load Index (PLI) and Potential Ecological Risk Index (PERI) methods. Through the integration of statistical characteristics, PLI, and PERI evaluations, a new assessment method was created, categorizing soil pollution into "Class0-no risk", "Class1-low risk", and "Class2-high risk". Various machine learning models, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree Classifier (DT), Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost, were employed to predict the soil quality based on these indices. XGBoost demonstrated the highest accuracy, achieving a prediction accuracy of 93%. SHAP analysis was further applied to explain the machine learning model and determined that the accumulation of key pollutants such as cadmium (Cd) and mercury (Hg) may significantly produce soil pollution risk, and targeted management needs to be developed for these pollution features.

Indexed as

classification modelheavy metalsmachine learningNansi Lakepollution load indexpotential ecological risk indexSHAPsoil pollutionXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID40278594
PMCPMC12030823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.