ArticleToxics2025
Prediction of Soil Pollution Risk Based on Machine Learning and SHAP Interpretable Models in the Nansi Lake, China.
Article in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Powered One Health: A Predictive Framework for Managing Persistent Chemical Threats across Human, Animal, and Environmental Systems.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To assess and predict the Nansi Lake soil pollution risk, we evaluate the soil environmental quality in the Nansi Lake region using machine learning techniques, combined with the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) model for interpretability. The primary objective was to predict the level of soil pollution caused by heavy metals, incorporating the traditional Pollution Load Index (PLI) and Potential Ecological Risk Index (PERI) methods. Through the integration of statistical characteristics, PLI, and PERI evaluations, a new assessment method was created, categorizing soil pollution into "Class0-no risk", "Class1-low risk", and "Class2-high risk". Various machine learning models, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree Classifier (DT), Random Forest (RF), and XGBoost, were employed to predict the soil quality based on these indices. XGBoost demonstrated the highest accuracy, achieving a prediction accuracy of 93%. SHAP analysis was further applied to explain the machine learning model and determined that the accumulation of key pollutants such as cadmium (Cd) and mercury (Hg) may significantly produce soil pollution risk, and targeted management needs to be developed for these pollution features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.