ArticleToxics2025
Prediction of Respiratory Irritation and Respiratory Sensitization of Chemicals Using Structural Alerts and Machine Learning Modeling.
Article in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving machine-learning development in allergology: bridging the gap between open-access and cohort-based databases.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2026Review
- Toxicological evaluation of volatile organic compounds emitted from scented candles:Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inhalation of toxic substances and contaminants can have adverse effects on the respiratory tract, leading to a range of health problems, such as irritation and inflammation, allergic reaction and asthma, lung damage, or even death. It is not possible to experimentally evaluate respiratory toxicity for all the thousands of chemicals in use. Here, we generated structural alerts and developed machine learning (ML) classification models to predict respiratory irritation and respiratory sensitization hazards of chemicals using experimental data from publicly available databases and the literature. We identified 13 structural alerts for respiratory irritants and 18 structural alerts for respiratory sensitizers. We also developed a set of models for each hazard using different types of molecular descriptors and ML techniques. Five of the best performing models were combined into a consensus classification model for respiratory irritation, and four individual models were used to develop a consensus classification model for respiratory sensitization. The prediction accuracy of the respiratory irritation consensus model was 84% on the training set and 88% on the test set, and the accuracy of the respiratory sensitization consensus model was 86% on both training and test data sets. A combination of generated structural alerts and ML models was used to screen occupational- and military-relevant chemicals. Out of 687 screened occupational chemicals, 62 compounds were identified as respiratory irritants and 121 chemicals as respiratory sensitizers, while 47 chemicals were predicted as irritants and 36 compounds as sensitizers in the list of 525 military-relevant chemicals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.