ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluating Pharmacy Student Perspectives and Attitudes Towards Compliance Aids and Devices Through Health Disparity Simulation.
Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study intends to evaluate simulated experiences provided to pharmacy students that directly compare the perspective of patients managing chronic disease states through traditional means without compliance aids to those using compliance aids, such as continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) and other devices.
methodsThis simulation was conducted with third-year pharmacy students enrolled in the ambulatory care elective course at the University of Florida College of Pharmacy. It was designed to simulate a patient responsible for self-administering an array of medications for multiple chronic diseases that the students are likely to encounter during clinical practice. For the first week, students were tasked with adhering to a complex medication schedule from their associated pill bottles without the use of compliance aids (pill organizers, alarms, etc.) and checking their blood glucose twice daily using a traditional glucometer. In the second week, students continued the role of the patient; however, they were provided with compliance aids and encouraged to set alarms and use CGMs. Using a questionnaire developed based on the traditional Likert scale model, the students were able to quantify their experiences in a way that allowed the investigators to observe any changes.
resultsRegarding the overall implications of this experience, most participants (>80%) agreed that this project increased their understanding of the value of compliance aids and devices and encouraged them to not only incorporate them into their future patient care plans but also advocate for accessibility to improve health outcomes.
conclusionStudents who completed this experience reported better adherence to chronic disease state control using compliance aids and, in turn, the applicability of the use of compliance aids in managing those with complex medication regimens. This simulation may encourage future pharmacists to incorporate compliance aids with their patients to improve health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.