ArticleMethods and protocols2025
Physical Exercise and Psychophysical Learnings on Basic Strength Development.
Article in Methods and protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training and Low-Intensity Steady-State Exercise on Anthropometric Outcomes and Psychophysical Well-Being: A Pilot Study.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- Comparison of traditional and ecological dynamical training approaches in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu: effects on Force Development, reactivity, and distress perception.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Maximum strength development in martial arts and perception and awareness: new approach for training methods.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Strength development through physical exercise enhances neuromodulator production, neural connectivity, and motor unit efficiency. Beyond physical benefits, understanding individuals' perceptions, opinions, and knowledge can optimize engagement in exercise. However, existing literature lacks studies examining these factors alongside strength development. This study aimed to investigate whether the effectiveness of strength training protocols is associated with individuals' perceptions, opinions, and knowledge, thereby establishing a link between performance enhancement and awareness of the physiological demands of exercise. The findings seek to highlight the educational potential of physical exercise in promoting psychophysical well-being. A total of 24 participants (14 males, 10 females), aged 35-55 years with varying occupational backgrounds and sedentary levels, were recruited. A strength development protocol was administered, and the participants completed perception-based questionnaires at three time points. Statistical analyses, including repeated-measures ANOVA, Friedman's test, and post hoc comparisons, were conducted. Significant strength improvements were observed, specifically in the Hand Grip Test (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.