Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40278234›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2025

Study of the Structure and Mechanical Properties of Ti-38Zr-11Nb Alloy.

Konstantin V Sergienko, Sergei V Konushkin, Yaroslava A Morozova, Mikhail A Kaplan, Artem D Gorbenko, Boris A Rumyantsev, Mikhail E Prutskov, Evgeny E Baranov, Elena O Nasakina, Tatiana M Sevostyanova and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Konstantin V SergienkoA.A. Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMET RAS), 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4018-4599
Sergei V KonushkinA.A. Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMET RAS), 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9574-1957
Yaroslava A MorozovaA.A. Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMET RAS), 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3526-5474
Mikhail A KaplanA.A. Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMET RAS), 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8635-0719
Artem D GorbenkoA.A. Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMET RAS), 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3357-4049
Boris A RumyantsevA.A. Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMET RAS), 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8250-3565
Mikhail E PrutskovA.A. Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMET RAS), 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Evgeny E BaranovA.A. Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMET RAS), 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Elena O NasakinaA.A. Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMET RAS), 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0783-1558
Tatiana M SevostyanovaNational Medical and Surgical Center Named after N.I. Pirogov of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 117513 Moscow, Russia.
Sofia A MikhlikA.A. Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMET RAS), 119334 Moscow, Russia.
Andrey P ChizhikovInstitute of Structural Macrokinetics and Materials Science, Russian Academy of Sciences (ISMAN), 142432 Chernogolovka, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2793-6952
Lyudmila A ShatovaFaculty of Radio Engineering and Electronics, Voronezh State Technical University, 394026 Voronezh, Russia.
Aleksandr V SimakinProkhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov Str. 38, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Ilya V BaimlerProkhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilov Str. 38, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Maria A SudarchikovaA.A. Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMET RAS), 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9708-3284
Mikhail L KheifetzInstitute of Applied Physics, NAS of Belarus, 220072 Minsk, Belarus.
Alexey G KolmakovA.A. Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMET RAS), 119334 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4907-951X
Mikhail A SevostyanovA.A. Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMET RAS), 119334 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 24-13-00186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hip joint implants are among the most prevalent types of medical implants utilized for the replacement of damaged joints. The utilization of modern implant materials, such as cobalt-chromium alloys, stainless steel, titanium, and other titanium alloys, is accompanied by challenges, including the toxicity of certain elements (e.g., aluminum, vanadium, nickel) and excessive Young's modulus, which adversely impact biomechanical compatibility. A mismatch between the stiffness of the implant material and the bone tissue, known as stress shielding, can lead to adverse outcomes such as bone resorption and implant loosening. Recent studies have shifted the focus to β-titanium alloys due to their exceptional biocompatibility, corrosion resistance, and low Young's modulus, which is close to the Young's modulus of bone tissue (10-30 GPa). In this study, the microstructure, mechanical properties, and phase stability of the Ti-38Zr-11Nb alloy were investigated. Energy dispersion spectrometry was employed to confirm the homogeneous distribution of Ti, Zr, and Nb in the alloy. A subsequent microstructural analysis revealed the presence of elongated β-grains subsequent to rolling and quenching. Furthermore, grinding contributed to the process of recrystallization and the formation of subgrains. X-ray diffraction analysis confirmed the presence of a stable β-phase under any heat treatment conditions, which can be explained by the use of Nb as a β-stabilizer and Zr as a neutral element with a weak β-stabilizing effect in the presence of other β-stabilizers. Furthermore, the modulus of elasticity, as determined by tensile testing, exhibited a decline from 85 GPa to 81 GPa after annealing. Mechanical tests demonstrated a substantial enhancement in tensile strength (from 529 MPa to 628 MPa) concurrent with a 32% reduction in elongation to fracture of the samples. These alterations are attributed to microstructural transformations, including the formation of subgrains and the rearrangement of dislocations. This study's findings suggest that the Ti-38Zr-11Nb alloy has potential as a material of choice due to its lower Young's modulus compared to traditional materials and its stable β-phase, which enhances the implant's durability and reduces the risk of brittle phases forming over time. This study demonstrates that the corrosion resistance of titanium grade 2 and Ti-38Zr-11Nb is comparable. The material in question exhibited no evidence of cytotoxic activity in the context of mammalian cells.

Indexed as

mechanical propertiesmedical materialstitanium alloysβ-titanium

Identifiers

PMID40278234
PMCPMC12027529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.