Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40278193›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025

Endurance Training Exercise Dose in Coronary Artery Disease Rehabilitation.

Daria Neyroud, Aaron L Baggish

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daria NeyroudInstitute of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5886-802X
Aaron L BaggishInstitute of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2042-1489

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical management of patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) following acute coronary syndrome includes cardiac rehabilitation. The well-established hallmark of cardiac rehabilitation is structured aerobic exercise training. To date, however, a limited number of studies have directly compared the effects of different doses of exercise on cardiovascular health, leaving uncertainty about the possible differential benefits of different exercise doses for use during cardiac rehabilitation. To address this area of uncertainty, we conducted a literature review and comparative analyses of studies that both compared two or more exercise interventions and assessed pre- and post-intervention peak oxygen consumption (V˙O2PEAK). Results from these analyses suggest that high exercise intensity, even when performed over relatively short duration interventions, appears to yield the most substantial improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness. However, this conclusion is based on the limited number of available studies, underscoring the need for future work examining exercise dose and clinical outcomes in the cardiac rehabilitation setting.

Indexed as

cardiac rehabilitationcoronary artery disease secondary preventionexercise doseexercise durationexercise frequencyexercise intensityexercise volumehigh-intensity interval training

Identifiers

PMID40278193
PMCPMC12028330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.