ArticleJournal of Intelligence2025
Automated Graphic Divergent Thinking Assessment: A Multimodal Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Random Forest Predicts Human Ratings of Creative Stories Using Very Small Training Samples.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes a multimodal deep learning model for automated scoring of image-based divergent thinking tests, integrating visual and semantic features to improve assessment objectivity and efficiency. Utilizing 708 Chinese high school students' responses from validated tests, we developed a system combining pretrained ResNet50 (image features) and GloVe (text embeddings), fused through a fully connected neural network with MSE loss and Adam optimization. The training set (603 images, triple-rated consensus scores) showed strong alignment with human scores (Pearson r = 0.810). Validation on 100 images demonstrated generalization capacity (r = 0.561), while participant-level analysis achieved 0.602 correlation with total human scores. Results indicate multimodal integration effectively captures divergent thinking dimensions, enabling simultaneous evaluation of novelty, fluency, and flexibility. This approach reduces manual scoring subjectivity, streamlines assessment processes, and maintains cost-effectiveness while preserving psychometric rigor. The findings advance automated cognitive evaluation methodologies by demonstrating the complementary value of visual-textual feature fusion in creativity assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.