Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40278054›Full record

ArticleJournal of Intelligence2025

Automated Graphic Divergent Thinking Assessment: A Multimodal Machine Learning Approach.

Hezhi Zhang, Hang Dong, Ying Wang, Xinyu Zhang, Fan Yu, Bailin Ren, Jianping Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hezhi ZhangFaculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.ORCID 0009-0004-9412-8343
Hang DongFaculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.ORCID 0009-0004-6576-3671
Ying WangFaculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Xinyu ZhangFaculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Fan YuFaculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Bailin RenFaculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Jianping XuFaculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8242-2992

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study proposes a multimodal deep learning model for automated scoring of image-based divergent thinking tests, integrating visual and semantic features to improve assessment objectivity and efficiency. Utilizing 708 Chinese high school students' responses from validated tests, we developed a system combining pretrained ResNet50 (image features) and GloVe (text embeddings), fused through a fully connected neural network with MSE loss and Adam optimization. The training set (603 images, triple-rated consensus scores) showed strong alignment with human scores (Pearson r = 0.810). Validation on 100 images demonstrated generalization capacity (r = 0.561), while participant-level analysis achieved 0.602 correlation with total human scores. Results indicate multimodal integration effectively captures divergent thinking dimensions, enabling simultaneous evaluation of novelty, fluency, and flexibility. This approach reduces manual scoring subjectivity, streamlines assessment processes, and maintains cost-effectiveness while preserving psychometric rigor. The findings advance automated cognitive evaluation methodologies by demonstrating the complementary value of visual-textual feature fusion in creativity assessment.

Indexed as

automated scoringdeep learningdivergent thinkinggraphic completionmultimodality

Identifiers

PMID40278054
PMCPMC12028077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.