Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40277910›Full record

ReviewCells2025

Softness or Stiffness What Contributes to Cancer and Cancer Metastasis?

Claudia Tanja Mierke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Claudia Tanja MierkeFaculty of Physics and Earth System Sciences, Peter Debye Institute of Soft Matter Physics, Biological Physics Division, Leipzig University, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6622-335X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beyond the genomic and proteomic analysis of bulk and single cancer cells, a new focus of cancer research is emerging that is based on the mechanical analysis of cancer cells. Therefore, several biophysical techniques have been developed and adapted. The characterization of cancer cells, like human cancer cell lines, started with their mechanical characterization at mostly a single timepoint. A universal hypothesis has been proposed that cancer cells need to be softer to migrate and invade tissues and subsequently metastasize in targeted organs. Thus, the softness of cancer cells has been suggested to serve as a universal physical marker for the malignancy of cancer types. However, it has turned out that there exists the opposite phenomenon, namely that stiffer cancer cells are more migratory and invasive and therefore lead to more metastases. These contradictory results question the universality of the role of softness of cancer cells in the malignant progression of cancers. Another problem is that the various biophysical techniques used can affect the mechanical properties of cancer cells, making it even more difficult to compare the results of different studies. Apart from the instrumentation, the culture and measurement conditions of the cancer cells can influence the mechanical measurements. The review highlights the main advances of the mechanical characterization of cancer cells, discusses the strength and weaknesses of the approaches, and questions whether the passive mechanical characterization of cancer cells is still state-of-the art. Besides the cell models, conditions and biophysical setups, the role of the microenvironment on the mechanical characteristics of cancer cells is presented and debated. Finally, combinatorial approaches to determine the malignant potential of tumors, such as the involvement of the ECM, the cells in a homogeneous or heterogeneous association, or biological multi-omics analyses, together with the dynamic-mechanical analysis of cancer cells, are highlighted as new frontiers of research.

Indexed as

Neoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCell MovementHumansatomic force microscopycell mechanicsdeformabilitymatrix confinementmechanobiologyoptical cell stretcherphysics of cancersoftness and stiffnesstissue patchinessviscoelasticity

Identifiers

PMID40277910
PMCPMC12026216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.