ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2025
Mental Health Continuum-Short Form: Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of Competing Models with Adolescents from Portugal.
Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resilience, Life Satisfaction, and Well-Being in Portuguese Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Mental Health and Well-Being of Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Canonical Correlation Analysis.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The concept of positive mental health (PMH) and therefore mental well-being (MWB) have taken center stage over the last few decades. The Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) is one of the most important tools for assessing MWB. This study aims to assess the psychometric properties and dimensionality of the Portuguese version of the MHC-SF by comparing three competing models.
methodsBetween January and March of 2021, a survey was conducted with a convenience sample of 495 Portuguese adolescents aged 12 to 18 years, enrolled in grades 7 to 12. Descriptive statistics and bivariate statistical tests and measures associated with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were calculated.
resultsThe results of the CFA support the idea that the bifactor model fits the data better than the other competing models. The indices support unidimensionality, namely the explained common variance (ECV = 0.81), the Percentage of Uncontaminated Correlations (PUC = 0.69), and the omega hierarchical (ωH = 0.89), and point to the existence of a general MHC-SF factor. The scale showed high reliability (ω = 0.95) in the general factor. The MHC-SF has concurrent validity, correlating with other scales that assess aspects related to mental health and well-being.
conclusionThe results point to the adequacy of the bifactor model and suggest the existence of a general factor of PMH, confirming that the total score of the scale can be used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.