Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40277797›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Contemporary Advanced Prostate Cancer Treatment Sequences.

Valentyn Litvin, Armen G Aprikian, Alice Dragomir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Valentyn LitvinFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Montréal, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0025-6714
Armen G AprikianDivision of Urology, McGill University, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
Alice DragomirFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Montréal, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.

Funding

Chaire pharmaceutique Sanofi sur l'usage optimal des médicaments de l'Université de Montréal RH000912Réseau québécois de recherche sur les médicaments (RQRM) / Fonds de recherche du Québec (FRQS) 337735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a proliferation of novel treatments for the management of advanced prostate cancer (PCa), including androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI). Although there are health economic analyses of novel PCa treatments, such as ARPIs for specific health states, there is a lack of sequential analyses. Our paper aims to fill this gap. We developed a Monte Carlo Markov model to simulate the management of advanced PCa to end-of-life. We modeled patients who begin in metastatic and nonmetastatic castration-sensitive PCa (mCSPC and nmCSPC), with risk stratification for mCSPC, progressing to metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC). Using current guidelines and recent literature, we simulated admissible treatment sequences over these states along a 15-year horizon. We report the best treatment sequences in terms of efficacy and cost-effectiveness. We find that the most cost-effective use of ARPIs is early in advanced PCa for a cost-effectiveness threshold (CET) of CAD 100K per QALY. For a CET of CAD 50K per QALY, early ARPI use is most cost-effective in mCSPC-starting patients but not nmCSPC-starting. We conclude that the most cost-effective way to use ARPIs is when patients first enter advanced PCa. The most cost-effective ARPI at current Canadian prices is abiraterone, mostly due to abiraterone's lower price level.

Indexed as

Androgen Receptor AntagonistsProstatic NeoplasmsProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisHumansMaleMarkov ChainsMonte Carlo MethodQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAndrogen Receptor Antagonistsandrogen-receptor pathway inhibitorcost-effectivenessprostate cancertreatment sequence

Identifiers

PMID40277797
PMCPMC12025438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.