Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40277795›Full record

Observational studyCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Patients with Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Jennifer D Deem, Zsolt Hepp, Joshua J Carlson

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer D DeemCHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8865-5145
Zsolt HeppPfizer Inc., New York, NY 10001, USA.
Joshua J CarlsonCHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide, about two million people are diagnosed with lung cancer each year, 85% of whom have non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent progress in treating advanced/metastatic NSCLC with targeted therapies has shifted attention to early NSCLC (Stages I-IIIA) and perioperative (neoadjuvant and adjuvant) systemic therapies. However, our comprehension of how targeted therapeutics are incorporated into care and their impact on patient outcomes is just starting to unfold.

methodsThis retrospective observational study used a US nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database spanning January 2019-March 2024 and aimed to describe (1) eNSCLC patient demographic and clinical characteristics, (2) real-world neoadjuvant and adjuvant use, and (3) patient outcomes.

resultsThe study population included 4841 Stage IB-IIIA NSCLC patients with a mean age of 70.9 ± 8.6 years. The majority (69.9%) received definitive treatment: surgery (

conclusionsIn this study, we found that although the majority of patients underwent some form of definitive treatment, adjuvant use was limited, and neoadjuvant use was rarely included in care. A crucial initial step in improving patient outcomes is to understand and address the underutilization of neoadjuvant/adjuvant systemic therapy for eNSCLC patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeearly NSCLCpatient outcomesreal-worldtreatment patterns

Identifiers

PMID40277795
PMCPMC12026175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.