Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40277764›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2025

Canadian Expert Consensus Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Glioblastoma: Results of a Delphi Study.

Warren P Mason, Rebecca A Harrison, Sarah Lapointe, Mary Jane Lim-Fat, Mary V MacNeil, David Mathieu, James R Perry, Marshall W Pitz, David Roberge, Derek S Tsang and 4 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Warren P MasonDepartment of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
Rebecca A HarrisonDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada.
Sarah LapointeDepartment of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montreal, Montreal, QC H2X 3J4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7363-7382
Mary Jane Lim-FatDepartment of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Mary V MacNeilDepartment of Medicine, Dalhousie University, QE II Health Science Centre, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada.
David MathieuDepartment of Surgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 5N4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2029-6315
James R PerryOdette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Marshall W PitzDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada.
David RobergeDivision of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montreal, Montreal, QC H2X 0C1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8747-648X
Derek S TsangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9762-6901
Christina TsienDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
Frank K H van LandeghemDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9404-7031
Gelareh ZadehDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada.
Jacob EasawDepartment of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada.

Funding

Novocure N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive malignant brain tumor in adults, with an increasing incidence and a poor prognosis. Current challenges in glioblastoma management include rapid tumor growth, limited treatment effectiveness, high recurrence rates, and a significant impact on patients' quality of life. Given the complexity of glioblastoma care and recent advancements in diagnostic and treatment modalities, updated guidelines are needed in Canada. This Delphi study aimed to develop Canadian consensus recommendations for the diagnosis, classification, and management of newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma. A multidisciplinary panel of 14 Canadian experts in glioblastoma care was convened, and a comprehensive literature review was conducted to synthesize evidence and formulate initial recommendations. Consensus was achieved through three Delphi rounds, in which panelists rated their agreement with recommendation statements on a five-point Likert scale. Statements with ≥75% agreement were accepted, and others were revised for re-voting. Final recommendations were formulated based on the consensus level, strength of evidence, clinical expertise, and consideration of the Canadian healthcare context. These recommendations aim to standardize glioblastoma diagnosis and classification across Canada, provide evidence-based guidance for optimal treatment selection, integrate novel therapies, and enhance the overall quality of care for glioblastoma patients.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaCanadaConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansdiagnosisglioblastomaimmunotherapymanagementmolecular markerstargeted therapytumor-treating fields

Identifiers

PMID40277764
PMCPMC12026134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.