ArticleBiosensors2025
Point-of-Care NSE Biosensor for Objective Assessment of Stroke Risk.
Article in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-Generation Stroke Biomarkers: Bridging the Gap Between Innovation and Translation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- What Is a Biosensor?-A Terminological Guide From Biomolecular Recognition to Bioindicators.Engineering in life sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- The Future of Tumor Markers: Advancing Early Malignancy Detection Through Omics Technologies, Continuous Monitoring, and Personalized Reference Intervals.Biomolecules · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid identification of stroke is critical to improving stroke patient outcomes. Existing protocols for assessing the risk of stroke are subjective and may be further complicated by nonspecific symptoms, increasing the risk of misdiagnosis. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) has emerged as a promising stroke biomarker. However, current detection methods such as the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) are time-consuming and costly. In this research, we developed an electrochemical biosensor for the rapid quantification of NSE in whole blood. Mouse stroke models were established, and blood samples collected were analyzed using both hospital-standard ECLIA as well as the biosensor. The biosensor limit of detection was 1.15 ng/mL. NSE measurements were highly correlated between the two methods and were obtained in 5 min using 20 μL of unprocessed whole blood samples. Notably, the biosensor could accurately quantify elevated blood NSE blood that was associated with more severe stroke. Our results demonstrate the utility of the proposed biosensor in pre-hospital settings. Combined with existing stroke assessment methods, the biosensor may enable emergency personnel to identify stroke risk with greater accuracy to optimize the chances of receiving necessary treatment within the effective window.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.