ArticleBiosensors2025
Achievement of 15-Minute Adaptive PCR Benchmark with 1370 nm Laser Heating.
Article in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- L-DNA calibrators for PCR amplicon characterization.Bioscience nanotechnology · 2026Article
- Molecular diagnostics for cutaneous leishmaniasis: progress towards fulfilling the WHO target product profile.Parasitology · 2025Review
- A Novel Microelectrode Based on Joule Heating and Impedance Spectroscopy for Inducing and Monitoring the Aggregation of HCV-Specific Probes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In low-resource and point-of-care settings, traditional PCR often faces challenges of poor sample preparation, adverse environmental conditions, and long assay times. We have previously described a laboratory-based instrument to achieve "adaptive" PCR, a PCR thermocycling control system that replaces preset cycling times and temperatures with the optical monitoring of added L-DNA stereoisomers matching the sequences of the reaction primers and target. These L-DNA biosensors directly monitor DNA hybridization, compensating for ambient environmental conditions and poor sample preparation. This report describes instrument simplifications and a comparative evaluation of both direct photothermal and plasmonic laser heating to reduce the assay time to 15 min. Instrument performance was assessed using a split sample design to compare reaction performances of 1370 and 808 nm adaptive PCR heating modalities to a standard PCR instrument. Both the novel 1370 nm direct heating and the 808 nm plasmonic method achieved target amplification similar to the traditional PCR system within 15 min. However, a major disadvantage of 808 nm heating was nanorod optical interference that reduced the fluorescence signal from PCR probes and optical cycling components. Further characterization of the 1370 nm direct heating method found comparable limits of detection of 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.